Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 21;2(4):448–457. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.04.001

Table 2.

Correlation matrix, showing partial and bivariate correlations between the neural ratio effect in regions of interest and behavioral variables of interest.

Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Math Fluency (RS) −.56* −.66** .58* .58* .48 .16 .37 −.02 .001
2. Ratio Effect (RT) .54* −.58* −.35 −.36 −.06 −.34 .26 .27
3. Ratio Effect (INACC) −.69** −.50* −.47 −.18 −.39 −.08 −.02
4. Left IPS Ratio Effect (ROI) .60* .72** .50* .20 −.01 .29
5. Right IFG Ratio Effect (ROI) .44 .53* .09 .38 −.10
6. Left SFG Ratio Effect (ROI) .37 .15 .07 .01
7. Right IPS (ROI) −.07 .14 −.08
8. Reading Fluency RS .30 .53*
9. Nonverbal IQ RS .29
10. Verbal IQ RS
11. IQ Composite SS −.002 .28 −.08 −.07 .29 .06 .14 .39 .94** .40

Note: RS, raw score; RT, reaction time; INACC, percent incorrect; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; ROI, region of interest.

Partial correlations controlling for age are reported above the diagonal and bivariate correlations are reported below the diagonal.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.