Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;10:2111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58646-8

Table 1.

Patterns of abiotic and biotic stress resilience across the Vigna genus.

Main region of distribution Sections and gene pools Total no. of taxa Presence in extreme climates compared with other taxaa Abiotic stress toleranceb Biotic stress resistancec
No. of taxa evaluated High AMEANTd High TWETQe Low APf Low PWETQg No. of taxa screened Dehydration Salinity No. of taxa reviewed YMDh No. of taxa reviewed Bruchids
Asia Section Aconitifoliae 7 6 1 3 1 1 7 1 0 2 2 3 1
Asia Section Angulares 14 13 1 1 0 0 13 1 3 4 4 11 9
Asia Section Ceratotropis 7 5 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 3 3 5 3
Asia Total gene pool A 28 24 2 6 1 1 26 2 3 9 9 19 13
Africa Section Plectotropis 7 7 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 0 na 1 1
Africa Section Pseudoliebrechtsia 1 0 na na na na 0 na na 0 na 0 na
Africa Total gene pool B 8 7 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 0 na 1 1
Africa Section Catiang 20 17 0 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 1 1 1
Africa Section Macrodontae 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 na na 0 na 0 na
Africa Section Reticulatae 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 na na 0 na 1 1
Africa Total gene pool C 28 24 0 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 1 2 2
Africa Section Vigna 24 22 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 0 na 2 2
Africa Total gene pool D 24 22 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 0 na 2 2

aData analysis obtained in the ecogeographic analysis of this study; bScreening for drought and salinity tolerance carried out by Iseki et al.11,16; cLiterature review carried out in this study; dAMEANT: Annual Mean Temperature; eTWETQ: Temperature in the Wettest Quarter; fAP: Annual Precipitation; gPWETQ: Precipitation in the Wettest Quarter; hYMD: Yellow Mosaic Disease; na: not applicable.