Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;10:2102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58518-1

Table 1.

Effect of pollination treatments on yield parameters in faba bean in flight cage and field experiments.

Bean number Pod number Beans per pod
Self Trip Cross % Self Trip Cross % Self Trip Cross %
2017 cage Diana07 11 ± 8 37 ± 15 39 ± 19 71* 6 ± 4 15 ± 4 15 ± 7 60* 1.9 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.4 27
Fuego 23 ± 13 44 ± 13 44 ± 20 47* 9 ± 4 13 ± 4 14 ± 4 33 2.6 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 1.2 22*
Fury 26 ± 19 46 ± 13 43 ± 24 41 11 ± 6 16 ± 4 14 ± 8 28 2.1 ± 1.2 2.9 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.7 31*
Vertigo 33 ± 19 46 ± 14 38 ± 22 21 12 ± 5 15 ± 4 12 ± 6 10 2.6 ± 0.8 3.1 ± 0.5 3 ± 0.7 18
Hedin/2 68 ± 12 64 ± 16 54 ± 10 13* 22 ± 5 21 ± 4 19 ± 5 −11* 3 ± 0.4 3 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.4 2
2018 cage Diana07 3 ± 2 9 ± 8 11 ± 4 75* 2 ± 1 5 ± 3 4 ± 2 62* 1.2 ± 0.9 1.9 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.4 45
Fuego 9 ± 7 10 ± 5 13 ± 9 22* 4 ± 2 4 ± 2 5 ± 3 4 2.5 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 0.9 2.7 ± 1.1 11*
Fury 9 ± 8 13 ± 13 15 ± 9 37 6 ± 4 6 ± 6 6 ± 3 −4 1.4 ± 1.1 2.3 ± 0.9 2.7 ± 0.3 46*
Vertigo 18 ± 14 15 ± 13 21 ± 6 2 6 ± 4 5 ± 4 7 ± 2 6 2.6 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 1.4 3 ± 0.6 2
Hedin/2 32 ± 13 18 ± 9 14 ± 6 −50* 12 ± 5 6 ± 3 5 ± 1 −55* 2.7 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.6 8
2018 field Fuego 16 ± 12 16 ± 11 14 ± 7 1 7 ± 5 6 ± 4 6 ± 4 −5 2.4 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 1 2.4 ± 1 3
Fury 21 ± 10 19 ± 9 20 ± 11 10 9 ± 4 9 ± 4 8 ± 5 0 2.3 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.8 10
Vertigo 16 ± 6 16 ± 11 20 ± 9 4 6 ± 3 6 ± 5 8 ± 3 5 2.7 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.5 8

Values presented are rounded mean ± SD and percentage pollination dependence (indicated by %). Pollination dependence is rounded and is calculated from average of hand and tripping treatments in cage experiments, and from tripping treatment in field experiment. In field experiment, cross = open. Asterisks indicate pollination benefit where posthoc test of pollination treatments within a cultivar are significant (p < 0.05).