Table 1.
PRODS Workforce Survey 2013.
| Total | Responsive Programs | Nonresponsive Programs | Nonresponsive Programs With Residents | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 87 | 2008 | 339 | 320 | 94% | 77 | 60 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 359 | 344 | 96% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 1802 | 2010 | 359 | 329 | 92% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 357 | 262 | 73% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 1514 | 2012 | 388 | 124 | 32% | 882 | 882 | ||
| By region | ||||||||
| Northeast | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 26 | 2008 | 115 | 100 | 87% | 23 | 17 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 124 | 114 | 92% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 596 | 2010 | 107 | 92 | 86% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 120 | 74 | 62% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 463 | 2012 | 130 | 37 | 28% | 229 | 229 | ||
| Midwest | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 21 | 2008 | 74 | 73 | 99% | 19 | 13 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 76 | 74 | 97% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 395 | 2010 | 83 | 77 | 93% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 81 | 65 | 80% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 339 | 2012 | 81 | 26 | 32% | 217 | 217 | ||
| West | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 11 | 2008 | 46 | 46 | 100% | 11 | 10 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 48 | 47 | 98% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 238 | 2010 | 50 | 48 | 96% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 43 | 27 | 63% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 226 | 2012 | 51 | 20 | 39% | 142 | 142 | ||
| South | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 29 | 2008 | 104 | 101 | 97% | 24 | 20 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 111 | 109 | 98% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 573 | 2010 | 119 | 112 | 94% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 113 | 96 | 85% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 486 | 2012 | 126 | 41 | 33% | 294 | 294 | ||
| By number of residents in program | ||||||||
| 0 to 14 | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | ||
| 35 | 2008 | 84 | 81 | 96% | 51 | 34 | ||
| Graduates | 2009 | 82 | 81 | 99% | Graduates | Graduates | ||
| 444 | 2010 | 97 | 90 | 93% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Residents | 2011 | 85 | 68 | 80% | Residents | Residents | ||
| 377 | 2012 | 96 | 29 | 30% | 336 | 336 | ||
| 15 to 19 | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | |||
| 21 | 2008 | 68 | 65 | 96% | 15 | |||
| Graduates | 2009 | 84 | 83 | 99% | Graduates | |||
| 396 | 2010 | 86 | 83 | 97% | 0 | |||
| Residents | 2011 | 76 | 60 | 79% | Residents | |||
| 347 | 2012 | 82 | 41 | 50% | 254 | |||
| 20 to 25 | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | |||
| 18 | 2008 | 88 | 78 | 89% | 7 | |||
| Graduates | 2009 | 98 | 92 | 94% | Graduates | |||
| 464 | 2010 | 83 | 76 | 92% | 0 | |||
| Residents | 2011 | 92 | 63 | 68% | Residents | |||
| 389 | 2012 | 103 | 30 | 29% | 160 | |||
| 26 up | ||||||||
| Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | |||
| 13 | 2008 | 99 | 96 | 97% | 4 | |||
| Graduates | 2009 | 95 | 88 | 93% | Graduates | |||
| 498 | 2010 | 93 | 80 | 86% | 0 | |||
| Residents | 2011 | 104 | 71 | 68% | Residents | |||
| 401 | 2012 | 107 | 24 | 22% | 132 | |||