Table 2.
Total | Responsive Programs | Nonresponsive Programs | Nonresponsive Programs With Residents | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
99 | 2012 | 419 | 408 | 97% | 65 | 42 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 411 | 392 | 95% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
2065 | 2014 | 434 | 416 | 96% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 414 | 322 | 78% | Residents | Residents | |||
1704 | 2016 | 387 | 95 | 25% | 654 | 654 | |||
By region | |||||||||
Northeast | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
28 | 2012 | 110 | 106 | 96% | 22 | 13 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 106 | 99 | 93% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
551 | 2014 | 122 | 116 | 95% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 117 | 89 | 76% | Residents | Residents | |||
456 | 2016 | 96 | 20 | 21% | 240 | 240 | |||
Midwest | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
21 | 2012 | 96 | 91 | 95% | 15 | 9 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 102 | 96 | 94% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
395 | 2014 | 105 | 101 | 96% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 99 | 74 | 75% | Residents | Residents | |||
339 | 2016 | 99 | 17 | 17% | 105 | 105 | |||
West | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
11 | 2012 | 77 | 75 | 97% | 7 | 4 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 74 | 72 | 97% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
238 | 2014 | 72 | 68 | 94% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 69 | 49 | 71% | Residents | Residents | |||
226 | 2016 | 70 | 15 | 21% | 70 | 70 | |||
South | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
29 | 2012 | 136 | 134 | 99% | 21 | 16 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 129 | 125 | 97% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
573 | 2014 | 135 | 131 | 97% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 129 | 110 | 85% | Residents | Residents | |||
486 | 2016 | 122 | 43 | 35% | 239 | 239 | |||
By number of residents in program | |||||||||
0 to 14 | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | Programs | |||
35 | 2012 | 98 | 89 | 91% | 45 | 22 | |||
Graduates | 2013 | 90 | 85 | 94% | Graduates | Graduates | |||
444 | 2014 | 110 | 102 | 93% | 0 | 0 | |||
Residents | 2015 | 95 | 66 | 69% | Residents | Residents | |||
377 | 2016 | 88 | 22 | 25% | 228 | 228 | |||
15 to 19 | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | ||||
21 | 2012 | 102 | 100 | 98% | 11 | ||||
Graduates | 2013 | 105 | 100 | 95% | Graduates | ||||
396 | 2014 | 99 | 95 | 96% | 0 | ||||
Residents | 2015 | 106 | 90 | 85% | Residents | ||||
347 | 2016 | 103 | 20 | 19% | 279 | ||||
20 to 25 | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | ||||
18 | 2012 | 140 | 138 | 99% | 5 | ||||
Graduates | 2013 | 135 | 131 | 97% | Graduates | ||||
464 | 2014 | 138 | 133 | 96% | 0 | ||||
Residents | 2015 | 129 | 99 | 77% | Residents | ||||
389 | 2016 | 121 | 32 | 26% | 109 | ||||
26 up | |||||||||
Programs | Year | Graduates | Employed | % | Programs | ||||
13 | 2012 | 79 | 79 | 100% | 1 | ||||
Graduates | 2013 | 81 | 76 | 94% | Graduates | ||||
498 | 2014 | 87 | 86 | 99% | 0 | ||||
Residents | 2015 | 84 | 67 | 80% | Residents | ||||
401 | 2016 | 75 | 21 | 28% | 35 |