Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;8:e8397. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8397

Figure 6. Best- and worst-case reconstructions generated from full magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentations in terms of absolute Euclidean distance (mm).

Figure 6

(A) Plantar view of best first metatarsal reconstruction; (B) plantar view of worst first metatarsal reconstruction; (C) medial view of best first metatarsal reconstruction; (D) medial view of worst first metatarsal reconstruction; (E) plantar view of best calcaneus reconstruction; (F) plantar view of worst calcaneus reconstruction; (G) lateral view of best calcaneus reconstruction; (H) lateral view of worst calcaneus reconstruction; (I) plantar view of best midfoot reconstruction; (J) plantar view of worst midfoot reconstruction; (K) proximal view of best midfoot reconstruction; (L) proximal view of worst midfoot reconstruction; (M) plantar view of best talus reconstruction; (N) plantar view of worst talus reconstruction; (O) lateral view of best talus reconstruction; and (P) lateral view of worst talus reconstruction. Non-shaded background: best-case reconstruction from the leave-one-out cross validation; and shaded background: worst-case reconstruction from the leave-one-out cross validation. Euclidean distance is represented by the colour map which ranges from 0 mm (cream) to 8 mm (brown). The midfoot segment includes the second-to-fifth metatarsals, cuneiforms (medial, intermediate, and lateral), cuboid, and navicular bones.