Table 1. Comparison of shape similarity between reconstructions generated from complete magnetic resonance imaging segmentations and sparse anatomical landmarks.
| Jaccard index | P-value | RMSE (mm) | P-value | Hausdorff distance (mm) | P-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete segmentation | Sparse landmarks | Complete segmentation | Sparse landmarks | Complete segmentation | Sparse landmarks | ||||
| First metatarsal | 0.82 (0.05) | 0.79 (0.06) | <0.01* | 1.02 (0.26) | 1.21 (0.55) | <0.01* | 3.08 (1.04) | 3.21 (0.94) | 0.55 |
| Midfoot | 0.77 (0.04) | 0.67 (0.06) | <0.01* | 1.07 (0.14) | 1.45 (0.30) | <0.01* | 6.63 (3.68) | 7.19 (3.54) | 0.03* |
| Calcaneus | 0.87 (0.03) | 0.83 (0.05) | <0.01* | 1.28 (0.25) | 1.66 (0.41) | <0.01* | 4.89 (1.91) | 5.55 (1.73) | 0.03* |
Notes:
All values are mean (standard deviation).
RMSE—root mean square error; the midfoot segment includes the second-to-fifth metatarsals, cuneiforms (medial, intermediate, and lateral), cuboid, and navicular.
Denotes significant differences in shape similarity between reconstructions generated from complete segmentations and sparse anatomical landmarks using a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.