Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;8:e8397. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8397

Table 1. Comparison of shape similarity between reconstructions generated from complete magnetic resonance imaging segmentations and sparse anatomical landmarks.

Jaccard index P-value RMSE (mm) P-value Hausdorff distance (mm) P-value
Complete segmentation Sparse landmarks Complete segmentation Sparse landmarks Complete segmentation Sparse landmarks
First metatarsal 0.82 (0.05) 0.79 (0.06) <0.01* 1.02 (0.26) 1.21 (0.55) <0.01* 3.08 (1.04) 3.21 (0.94) 0.55
Midfoot 0.77 (0.04) 0.67 (0.06) <0.01* 1.07 (0.14) 1.45 (0.30) <0.01* 6.63 (3.68) 7.19 (3.54) 0.03*
Calcaneus 0.87 (0.03) 0.83 (0.05) <0.01* 1.28 (0.25) 1.66 (0.41) <0.01* 4.89 (1.91) 5.55 (1.73) 0.03*

Notes:

All values are mean (standard deviation).

RMSE—root mean square error; the midfoot segment includes the second-to-fifth metatarsals, cuneiforms (medial, intermediate, and lateral), cuboid, and navicular.

*

Denotes significant differences in shape similarity between reconstructions generated from complete segmentations and sparse anatomical landmarks using a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.