Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;91(1):1–75. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1698503

Table 2.

Demographics and measurements of included cases. Values are frequency (%)

  Reoperated a Dead a Total b
Factor n = 124 (19) b n = 117 (18) b n = 654
Sex      
 Male 40 (15) 53 (20) 269 (41)
 Female 84 (22) 64 (17) 385 (59)
Age      
 ≤ 50 5 (9) 1 (2) 54 (8)
 51–60 17 (16) 10 (9) 109 (17)
 61–70 65 (29) 25 (11) 227 (35)
 71–80 13 (13) 15 (15) 97 (15)
 81–90 18 (17) 30 (29) 104 (16)
 > 90 6 (10) 36 (58) 63 (10)
Cortical thickness index      
 < 0.3 2 (13) 7 (46) 15 (2)
 0.3–0.4 15 (19) 22 (28) 78 (12)
 0.4–0.5 45 (19) 53 (22) 238 (36)
 0.5–0.6 45 (17) 28 (11) 263 (40)
 0.6–0.7 11 (25) 4 (9) 44 (7)
 > 0.7 0 ( 0 ( 0 (0)
Hours to surgery      
 < 12 27 (15) 25 (14) 182 (28)
 12–24 75 (23) 61 (19) 325 (50)
 24–36 12 (16) 13 (17) 77 (12)
 36–48 5 (16) 7 (23) 31 (5)
 > 48 2 (10) 7 (35) 20 (3)
Fracture displacement      
 Mildly displaced c 43 (12) 67 (19) 356 (54)
 Severely displaced d 81 (27) 50 (17) 298 (46)
Quality of reduction      
 Fully reduced e 33 (13) 38 (16) 245 (37)
 Partly reduced f 18 (21) 16 (19) 85 (13)
 Not reduced g 73 (23) 62 (19) 322 (49)
Angle of implants h      
 > 125° 112 (18) 111 (18) 621 (95)
 ≤ 125° 10 (33) 5 (17) 30 (5)
Protrusion of implant into the joint      
 No protrusion 118 (19) 113 (18) 636 (97)
 Protusion 6 (33) 4 (22) 18 (3)

aPercentage of the number of cases in each subgroup.

bPercentage of the total number of patients.

cGarden II with > 20° posterior tilt or Garden III type fracture.

dGarden IV type fracture.

eNon-displaced in AP view, < 10° posterior tilt (PT).

f Non-displaced in AP view, ≥ 10° PT.

gDisplaced in AP view.

hAngle of implants to the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft in AP.