Table 2.

Proposed and existing correlates of stationary harmony.

Method	Dyads	Triads
	r (p)	r (p)
T Δf∣Δt (Proposed) Equal Temperament	0.922 (0.0000)	0.907 (0.0000)
Log Periodicity Just [43]	0.982 (0.0000)	0.831 (0.0002)
Rel. Periodicity Just [43]	0.982 (0.0000)	0.846 (0.0001)
Log Periodicity Rational [43]	0.936 (0.0000)	0.813 (0.0004)
Rel. Periodicity Rational [43]	0.936 (0.0000)	0.808 (0.0004)
Rel. Periodicity Pythagorean [43]	0.817 (0.0003)	-
Rel. Periodicity Kirnberger III [43]	0.796 (0.0006)	-
Ω measure [62]	0.886 (0.0000)	-
Consonance Raw Value / Degree∗†	0.978 (0.0000)	0.826 (0.0016)
Dual Process [13]‡	-	0.791 (0.0006)
Percentage Similarity [53]‡	0.977 (0.0000)	0.802 (0.0005)
Instability [18]‡	-	0.698 (0.0040)
Tension [18]‡	-	0.599 (0.0153)
Sonance Factor$	0.982 (0.0000)	0.434 (0.0692)
Generalized Coincidence [63]‡	0.841 (0.0002)	-
Consonance Value||	0.940 (0.0000)	0.755 (0.0014)
Dissonance Curve [21]‡	0.905 (0.0000)	0.723 (0.0026)
Pure Tonality [22]‡	0.938 (0.0000)	0.675 (0.0162)
Complex Tonality [22]‡	0.738 (0.0020)	-
Roughness [23]‡	0.967 (0.0000)	0.352 (0.1193)
Sensory Dissonance [24, 25]‡	-	0.607 (0.0139)
Critical Bandwidth [12]‡	-	0.570 (0.0210)
Temporal Dissonance [8]‡	-	0.503 (0.0399)
Gradus Suavitatis#	0.941 (0.0000)	0.690 (0.0045)

^∗Raw Value was used for Dyads and Degree was used for Triads.

^†Fotlyn, 2012, as cited in [43]

^‡as cited in [43]

^$Dyads from [64] and Triads from Hofmann-Engl, 2004, both as cited in [43]

^||Brefeld, 2005, as cited in [43]

^¶Dyads from [23] and Triads from Hutchinson & Knopoff, 1979, both as cited in [43]

^#Euler, 1739, as cited in [43]