Table 3.
Samples | Model χ2 | Step χ2 | df | −2LogL | Nagelkerke R2 | Overall correct (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall sample (n = 401) | Model 1 | 55.879*** | 55.879*** | 7 | 430.074 | 0.185 | 71.8 |
Model 2 | 62.581*** | 6.702* | 9 | 423.372 | 0.206 | 71.8 | |
Model 3 | 69.069*** | 6.488* | 11 | 416.884 | 0.225 | 73.1 | |
By gender | |||||||
Boys (n = 216) | Model 1 | 25.896*** | 25.896*** | 6 | 178.109 | 0.185 | 81.9 |
Model 2 | 31.027*** | 5.131 | 8 | 172.979 | 0.219 | 84.3 | |
Model 3 | 33.335*** | 2.308 | 10 | 170.671 | 0.234 | 84.3 | |
Girls (n = 185) | Model 1 | 7.368 | 7.368 | 6 | 245.142 | 0.052 | 60.5 |
Model 2 | 13.411 | 6.043* | 8 | 239.099 | 0.094 | 61.6 | |
Model 3 | 20.474* | 7.064* | 10 | 232.035 | 0.141 | 63.8 |
Model 1: individual-level predictors; Model 2: individual and contextual-level predictors; Model 3: individual-, contextual-, and protective level predictors.
Asterisks indicate statistical significance;
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.