Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 29;18(1):116–126. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.1.116

Table 3.

Model fit statistics for each model (overall sample and by gender)

Samples Model χ2 Step χ2 df −2LogL Nagelkerke R2 Overall correct (%)
Overall sample (n = 401) Model 1 55.879*** 55.879*** 7 430.074 0.185 71.8
Model 2 62.581*** 6.702* 9 423.372 0.206 71.8
Model 3 69.069*** 6.488* 11 416.884 0.225 73.1
By gender
 Boys (n = 216) Model 1 25.896*** 25.896*** 6 178.109 0.185 81.9
Model 2 31.027*** 5.131 8 172.979 0.219 84.3
Model 3 33.335*** 2.308 10 170.671 0.234 84.3
 Girls (n = 185) Model 1 7.368 7.368 6 245.142 0.052 60.5
Model 2 13.411 6.043* 8 239.099 0.094 61.6
Model 3 20.474* 7.064* 10 232.035 0.141 63.8

Model 1: individual-level predictors; Model 2: individual and contextual-level predictors; Model 3: individual-, contextual-, and protective level predictors.

Asterisks indicate statistical significance;

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001.