Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 29;18(1):58–66. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.1.58

Table 1.

ANOVA of the demographics, psychiatry rating scores, and FAA in MDD patients and HCs

Variable MDD patients without SI (n = 44) MDD patients with SI (n = 23) HC (n = 60) F p η2
Age (yr) 39.30 ± 11.29 37.48 ± 9.33 34.83 ± 9.40 2.538 0.083 0.039
Sex 0.692a 0.708
 Male 5 (11.4) 4 (17.4) 10 (16.7)
 Female 39 (88.6) 19 (82.6) 50 (83.3)
HAM-A 24.91 ± 5.03 25.48 ± 5.12 0.191 0.664 0.003
HAM-D 29.27 ± 6.54 30.83 ± 6.32 0.871 0.354 0.013
FAA
 FP1–FP2 4.87 ± 16.05 10.77 ± 16.55 −4.66 ± 29.10 4.398* 0.014 0.066
 F3–F4 5.68 ± 23.80 4.83 ± 23.05 3.39 ± 22.04 0.132 0.877 0.002
 F7–F8 26.17 ± 13.02 16.97 ± 17.18 10.65 ± 21.82 9.059*** < 0.001 0.127

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

ANOVA, analysis of variance; FAA, frontal alpha asymmetry; MDD, major depressive disorder; HC, healty control; SI, suicidal ideation; HAM-A, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety; HAM-D, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

a

By chi-square test;

*

p < 0.05,

***

p < 0.001.

Following least significant difference post-hoc analysis:

MDD patients with SI > HC (p = 0.23),

MDD patients without SI > HC (p < 0.001).