Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;2020(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2

Comparison 5. Acupressure versus sham control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain intensity 6 472 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.93 [‐3.31, ‐0.55]
2 Use of pharmacological analgesia 1 75 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.20, 1.43]
3 Assisted vaginal birth 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.13, 71.92]
4 Caesarean section 4 313 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.27, 0.71]
5 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes 2 220 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 7.99]
6 Length of labour 4 399 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.91 [‐1.26, ‐0.57]
6.1 Length of labour 4 399 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.91 [‐1.26, ‐0.57]
7 Spontaneous vaginal birth 2 115 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.92, 1.18]
8 Augmentation with oxytocin 2 135 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.46, 0.91]
9 Anxiety 1 75 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.40 [‐2.51, ‐0.29]