Table 3.
Overall and Individual Maternal Race Subgroups Logistic Regression Models of Early Exclusive Infant Feeding for Birth year 2015 compared with 2008, 2008–2015
| Maternal Race | Crude OR (95% CIa) | Adjusted ORb (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| white | 2.60 (2.11 – 3.21) | 2.41 (1.95 – 2.99) |
| black | 2.40 (1.54 – 3.72) | 2.11 (1.35 – 3.32) |
| Native Hawaiian | 2.97 (2.55 – 3.46) | 3.05 (2.60 – 3.56) |
| Samoan | 3.59 (2.35 – 5.49) | 3.48 (2.23 – 5.44) |
| Filipino | 3.17 (2.53 – 3.97) | 3.29 (2.62 – 4.13) |
| Japanese | 3.79 (2.34 – 6.13) | 3.80 (2.29 – 6.31) |
| Chinese | 1.97 (1.26 – 3.10) | 2.20 (1.39 – 3.46) |
| Korean | 2.98 (1.04 – 8.49) | 2.68 (0.93 – 7.74) |
| All othersc | 2.77 (2.12 – 3.62) | 2.97 (2.26 – 3.89) |
| Overall | 2.80 (2.56 – 3.06) | 2.78 (2.54 – 3.05) |
Note: Data source is the Newborn Metabolic Screening-Linked Birth Certificate File. Individual models for each Maternal Race group and overall were used to assess trend difference between 2015 and 2008.
a
CI denotes Confidence interval around the odds ratio estimate
b
Individual models were adjusted for maternal age, marital status, birth attendant, and county of residence
c
All others include Vietnamese, Asian Indian, other Asian, Guamanian/Chamorro, other Pacific Islander, Puerto Rican, Portuguese, Cuban, Mexican, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and all others.