Table 4.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Predicting Couples’ Group Status from Main Study Variables

Predictor	LR x2	1:2	95% CI	1:3	95% CI	1:4	95% CI	2:3	95% CI	2:4	95% CI	3:4	95% CI
Female flooding	49.26***	3.20***	1.71–5.98	6.61***	3.47–12.60	2.09*	1.07–4.10	2.07**	1.29–3.32	1.53	0.80–2.92	3.16***	1.67–6.00
Male flooding	26.09***	2.86***	1.63–5.00	3.67***	2.06–6.54	1.64	0.92–3.00	1.29	0.82–2.03	1.74*	0.96–3.16	2.23**	1.23–4.06
Female experienced anger	20.48***	1.00*	1.00–1.01	1.00**	1.00–1.01	1.01*	1.00–1.01	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00
Male experienced anger	4.13	1.00	1.00–1.01	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	0.99–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.01	1.00	1.00–1.01
Female displayed anger	0.9	1.88	0.50–7.11	1.56	0.40–6.15	1.25	0.30–5.16	0.83	0.23–2.68	1.51	0.36–6.34	1.25	0.31–5.11
Male displayed anger	3.48	3.37	0.77–14.71	3.65	0.80–16.76	2.90	0.59–14.38	1.08	0.34–3.45	1.16	0.23–5.80	1.26	0.26–6.20
Female vocal intensity	2.42	1.00	0.98–1.02	1.00	0.98–1.02	1.01	0.99–1.03	1.00	0.98–1.02	0.99	0.96–1.01	0.99	0.97–1.01
Male vocal intensity	1.52	1.00	0.98–1.03	1.00	0.98–1.03	1.01	0.99–1.04	1.00	0.98–1.02	0.99	0.97–1.01	0.99	0.97–1.01

^*p <.05;

^**p < .01;

^***p < .001.

Notes: LR x2=−2Loglikelihood Chi Square; 1 = satisfied/nonIPV couples, 2 = distressed/nonIPV couples, 3 = distressed/IPV couples, 4 = satisfied/IPV couples