Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;117(5):2456–2461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911188117

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Standard two-state promoter model (Model 1): activator fidelity is bounded by the Hopfield barrier. (A) Transition graph of Model 1. (B) Activator fidelity approaches its upper limit or Hopfield barrier, f0=eΔΔG°/RT, as the activator on rate, κ, tends to zero. To calculate the graph, we assumed kC=1, ki=100. Actual fidelities must be markedly lower than f0: for instance, measured off-rates for Pho4 of yeast (the activator of PHO5) for specific and nonspecific sequences are ∼0.01 and 1 s−1, respectively (7, 9). From Pho4’s equilibrium dissociation constant for correct binding of Kd=11 nM (9), and nuclear concentration of 60 nM (47) (assuming a nuclear volume of 4 femtoliters), both the on-rate, κ=0.06s1 (indicated by a vertical line), and relative fidelity (indicated by horizontal line) may be calculated; the unit on the abscissa, then, is 0.01s1. (C) Representative “sample path” (single cell trajectory of mRNA abundance) at relative activator fidelity of 0.95; the sample path was obtained with the Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm (48) with κ=0.05, kC=1, δ=0.1 (rate constant for mRNA degradation), and average rate of transcription, vC=5. (D) The Fano factor tends to infinity as activator fidelity, f1, approaches the Hopfield barrier (i.e.,f1/f0=1). Calculations were based on the assumption of kC=1, δ=0.1, and average rate of transcription vC=5. Both Fano factor and fidelity were calculated as functions of the activator on-rate, κ (SI Appendix).