Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;93(2):149–187. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01467-8

Table 4.

Characteristics and results of the included studies, pre–post studies without control groups

Author (year) Population Case (n) Control (n) Intervention Outcome Result QA (x/15 points)
Ackermann et al. (2002a, b) Music students “Canberra School of Music”, Australia 10/9

Group 1: 6-week strength training

Group 2: 6-week endurance training

“PRMD’s” (performance-related musculoskeletal disorders): frequency and intensity, strength and endurance tests, i.a. Changes in PRMD’s n.s.; stat. sign. strength gains in both exercise groups 4
Chan et al. (2014) Orchestral musicians (symphonic orchestra), Australia 50 12-week exercise program by DVD, min 40 min of exercise per week “PRMDs” (performance-related musculoskeletal disorders): frequency and intensity, i.a. Reduction in the mean prevalence of PRMD from 3.3 (SD 2.9) to 2.1 (SD 2.1), in VAS (0–10) pain (95% CI − 2 to − 0.3 p < 0.01) and the mean intensity of PRMD from 2.9 (SD 2.4) to 1.9 (SD 1.9) in VAS (0–10) (95% CI − 1.8 to − 0.3, p < 0.01) − 3
Steinmetz et al. (2009) Musicians with craniomandibular dysfunctions (CMD), treated in outpatient practice of the authors, Germany 30 Time duration of treatment with oral splints (at least at night and during instrument playing) individually “CMD”: symptoms, pain in multiple body regions 80% of participants reported a stat. sign. reduction in dominant symptoms, 20% of participants reported a decrease in the days unable to play, 40% of participants reported an increase in pain when not wearing the splint; mean pain in the upper extremity decreased from 3.0 to 0.9 (of max. 5); neck pain decreased from 3.0 to 2.4; pain in teeth/TMJ decreased from 1.7 to 1.0 − 4

CI confidence interval, CMD craniomandibular dysfunction, n.s. not statistically significant, QA quality assessment, SD standard deviation, stat. sign. statistically significant, TMJ temporomandibular joint, VAS visual analog scale