Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Nov 22;121:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.11.013

Table 5.

Effects of Discrimination, Victimization, Connectedness, and LGBTQ Affirmation on Suicidal Ideation, Attempts, and NSSI

Suicidal Ideation Suicide Attempt Non-Suicidal Self-Injury
Wald χ2 (1) OR (95% CI) Wald χ2 (1) OR (95% CI) Wald χ2 (1) OR (95% CI)
Step 1a, b, d
 Discrimination 0.00 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) 0.31 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) 1.15 1.02 (0.98, 1.07)
 Victimization 3.29 1.04 (0.99, 1.11) 11.99** 1.11 (1.05, 1.18) 5.04* 1.07 (1.01, 1.13)
 Connectedness 23.32*** 0.81 (0.75, 0.89) 7.45** 0.87 (0.79, 0.96) 14.58*** 0.83 (0.76, 0.91)
 LGBTQ Affirm 0.52 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) 3.68 1.05 (1.00, 1.10) 0.67 1.02 (0.97, 1.07)
Step 2c
 Victim*Connect --- --- 4.62* 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) --- ---

Note.

*

p <.05

**

p <.01

***

p <.001.

All models controlled for age, gender, race, study-site, and sexual orientation. None of the interaction terms tested were statistically significant, and were removed from the final models

a

SI model: χ2 (15)=69.54, Nagelkerke R2 = .109, p <.001

b

SA model: χ2 (15)=89.62, Nagelkerke R2 = .156, p <.001

c

SA model: χ2 (1)=4.77, ΔR2=.008, p = .029

d

NSSI model: χ2 (15)=117.83, Nagelkerke R2 = .192, p <.001.