Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0172-x

Table 2.

Comparisons of personality traits, psychosocial functioning and marital adjustment of couples with and without a partner with bipolar disorder

Couples
One partner with BD Two healthy control partners
M (SD) M (SD) F η2
Personality (NEO-PI-R)a n = 58 n = 47
Neuroticism 55.37 (7.43) 44.94 (7.35) 35.86** .26
Extraversion 47.88 (6.45) 52.10 (5.56) 7.80** .07
Openness 49.68 (7.70) 52.10 (6.46) .13 .00
Agreeableness 50.11 (6.81) 52.16 (5.71) .51 .01
Conscientiousness 47.12 (7.73) 51.06 (5.45) 6.21* .06
Negative life events (LES)b n = 48 n = 33
Dependent 2.55 (1.47) 1.32 (1.17) 13.17** .14
Independent .40 (.48) .35 (.40) .61 .01
Coping skills (CISS)c n = 57 n = 47
Task-oriented 46.93 (7.43) 51.60 (7.20) 5.51* .05
Emotion-focused 52.56 (7.13) 46.19 (6.08) 13.41** .12
Avoidance-oriented 51.33 (8.15) 45.38 (7.60) 14.20** .12
Social support (ASSI)d n = 58 n = 47
Size of social network 10.16 (5.72) 17.20 (9.22) 12.52** .11
Satisfaction with social network 25.75 (2.89) 28.27 (1.85) 21.07** .17
Amount of social contact 7.00 (6.02) 12.45 (8.10) 8.73** .08
Satisfaction with social contact 4.19 (.76) 4.70 (.50) 10.33** .09
Marital adjustment (DAS)e n = 45 n = 46
Consensus 50.39 (6.72) 53.52 (5.44) 6.51* .07
Affectional expression 8.08 (2.41) 9.23 (1.95) 6.65* .07
Satisfaction 34.07 (7.80) 39.72 (4.22) 15.83** .15
Cohesion 14.04 (4.89) 16.15 (3.32) 5.25* .06
Verbal aggression (CTS)f n = 45 n = 45
Inter-partner 18.45 (19.47) 9.44 (9.34) 3.46 .04

Due to non-independence of data and to obtain a global estimate of couple functioning, mean scores across all available parents. when there was more than one parent in a family were used (number of single-parent families = 11 (7 BD))

T-scores were used for the Personality and Coping Skills subcategories, *p < .05, **p < .01

BD: bipolar disorder

aFrom the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised

bFrom the Life Events Scale

cFrom the Coping Inventory of Stressful Situations

dFrom the Arizona Social Support Interview

eFrom the Dyadic Adjustment Scale

fFrom the Conflict Tactic Scale