Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;14(2):254–266. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz131

Table 1.

Summary of publications identified by literature review [61] and by authors et al. [5] to support review.

Publication N Condition Study design Class of evidencea Main outcomes
Colombel J-F, 201716 244 CD Open-label phase 3 RCT I Endoscopic and deep remission outcomes
Colombel J-F, 201717 244 CD Open-label phase 3 RCT I Adverse outcomes [hospitalisations, surgeries]
Colombel J-F, 201336 778 CD Analysis of data from RCT and open-label extension I QOL [SF-36, IBDQ]
Colombel J-F, 2018b75 244 CD Open-label phase 3 RCT I Clinical and endoscopic outcomes, safety
de Jong MJ, 2017b76 909 IBD Pragmatic RCT I Number of outpatient visits, patient-reported quality of care, safety
D’Haens G, 2018b78 122 CD Double-blind RCT I Sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission
Elkjaer M, 201042 333 UC RCT I Feasibility of ‘constant care’ approach, influence on patients’ compliance, knowledge, QOL, disease outcomes, safety and health care costs
Hueppe A, 201441 514 CD/UC RCT I Health-related QOL, social participation
Khanna R, 201522 1982 CD Open-label cluster RCT I Proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free remission; adverse outcomes
Lasson A, 201534 91 UC Prospective, RCT I Relapse rate
Rutgeerts PJ, 201035 62 CD Post-hoc analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled study I CDAI scores and clinical remission status
Steenholdt C, 201551 69 CD RCT, single-blind, multicentre study I Long-term economic outcomes
Steenholdt C, 201452 69 CD RCT, single-blind, multicentre study I Response rate [CDAI], accumulated treatment-related costs
Vande Casteele N, 201550 263 CD/UC RCT I Clinical and biochemical remission
Bougen G, 20149 67 CD Retrospective, chart review II Mucosal healing [defined as the absence of any ulcers in any segment of the gastrointestinal tract during the endoscopic procedure]
Bougen G, 201415 60 UC Retrospective, chart review II Mucosal healing (defined as unremarkable findings including absence of any type of friability [even mild] and with possible remaining slight and patchy loss of vascular pattern, or erythema from inactive disease equivalent to a zero Mayo endoscopic subscore)
Burke K, 201360 107 UC Prospective observational cohort study II Long-term relapse rates and healthcare costs
Carter CT, 201161 638 CD Retrospective claims analysis II Adherence rates
Carter CT, 201262 448 CD Retrospective claims analysis II Adherence rates, hospitalisations, length hospital stay, inpatient costs
Chavannes M, 201646 188 IBD Single-centre retrospective cohort study II Serum levels of infliximab
Click BH, 201630 1600 IBD Registry review II Financial health care use and disease activity
Cook PF, 201071 524 UC Structured patient interviews II Impact of telephone nurse counselling on adherence
David G, 201454 21076 IBD Analysis of data from commercial databases II Adherence rates
D’Incà R, 201572 449 CD/UC Patient survey II Adherence, quality of life, illness intrusiveness
Debanjali M, 200963 1693 UC Analysis of data from claims database II Impact of medication adherence on costs and all-cause health care use
Feagan BG, 201464 945 CD Analysis of data from claims database II Health care costs by adherence status
Hodgkins P, 201265 400 UC Discrete-choice experiment II Differences in patient treatment preferences based on self-reported adherence
Kane S, 200866 4313 UC Analysis of data from claims database II Adherence, health care costs
Kane SV, 200967 571 CD Analysis of data from claims database II Adherence, health care use, costs
Lachaine J, 201168 1681 UC Retrospective prescription and medical claims analysis II Adherence, health care use, costs
Little RD, 201618 52 IBD Retrospective observational study II Clinical response [biomarker and physician global assessment]
Michels S, 201459 173 CD Analysis of data from claims database II Health care costs by different adherence thresholds
Mitra D, 201258 1693 UC Retrospective analysis of insurance claims II Adherence, all-cause costs and health care use
Orlaith K, 201647 312 IBD Single-centre retrospective study II Endoscopic remission
Papamichail K, 201648 43 UC Single-centre retrospective study II Short-term mucosal healing [defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of ≤1, assessed at Weeks 8–14, with a baseline sub-score of ≥2]
Paul S, 201349 52 CD/UC Prospective observational study II Mucosal healing [defined as faecal calprotectin <250 μg/g stools in CD and by an endoscopic Mayo score of 0 or 1 in UC]
Poillon L, 2018b77 226 CD/UC Retrospective single-centre follow-up of 50 II Long-term outcome data [IBD-related hospitalisation, abdominal surgery, and systemic steroid use], continued use of infliximab, trough concentrations
Qiu Y, 201645 272 CD Retrospective, observational cohort study II Mucosal healing [defined as a score of 0–2 using an endoscopic score system]
Ramos Rivers CM, 201433 1925 IBD Prospective observational registry study II Patients calling out of hours
Ray I, 201329 650 CD Single-centre, retrospective study II Severity of depression, pattern of outpatient service use, costs
Regueiro M, 201637 308 CD/UC Observational study of patients enrolling in patient-centred medical home II QOL [SIBDQ], health care resource use [ER visits, hospitalisations]
Regueiro M, 201638 108 CD/UC Observational study of patients enrolling in patient-centred medical home II IBD activity [UCAI and CD HBI], QOL [SIBDQ], depression [PHQ9]
Sandborn W, 201520 804 UC Retrospective chart review, adalimumab vs infliximab II Real-world effectiveness [symptoms and disease activity] and resource use [hospitalisation and surgery rates]
Schechter A, 201531 115 UC Chart review II Sustained steroid-free remission, colectomy
Schifrien B, 201369 3406 CD Retrospective claims database analysis II Adherence, health care costs
Selinger C, 201255 50 UC Face-to-face structured interview with patients II Preferred mode of information delivery, thresholds for adherence
Seth N, 201432 542 CD Prospective registry study II Persistent abdominal pain
Severs M, 201656 2612 CD/UC Prospective observational cohort study II Factors associated with non-adherence, changes in adherence and associated disease outcomes
Severs M, 201657 2612 CD/UC Prospective observational cohort study II Impact of medication adherence on the disease course, health care costs and health-related QOL
Taks M, 201743 33 IBD Single-centre evaluation of treatment algorithm II Remission rates, drug costs
Van Deen WK, 201639 98 [plus 293 controls] IBD Observational control-matched study II IBD-specific outcomes including medication use, office visits, IBD-specific tests, ED visits, and hospitalisations
Van Deen WK, 201640 98 [plus 293 controls] IBD Observational control-matched study II IBD-specific outcomes including medication use, office visits, IBD-specific tests, ED visits, and hospitalisations
Wan GJ, 201470 1646 IBD Database analysis II Adherence, health care costs
Yarur AJ, 201728 117 CD Cross sectional study II Fistula healing/closure, mucosal healing [defined as the absence of ulcerations ≥5 mm in the colon and terminal ileum]
Zittan E, 201627 60 CD Chart review/patient interview II Clinical and endoscopic remission
Ananthakrishnan AN, 201224 CD Decision analytic model comparing treatment strategies III Clinical response, QALYs, ICER, NNT to prevent surgery/hospitalisation
Ananthakrishnan AN, 201325 CD Decision analytic model comparing treatment strategies III Clinical response, QALYs, ICER, NNT to prevent surgery/hospitalisation
Mallow P, 201321 UC Cost-effectiveness modelling based on data from RCT III Cost per clinical response and NNT for clinical response
Panaccione R, 2017b79 244 CD Cost-effectiveness modelling based on data from RCT III Remission rates, CD-related hospitalisations, adalimumab injections, direct medical costs, QALYs, ICER, NMB
Saini SD, 201223 UC Markov cohort model III Cost utility outcomes
Thwaites PA, 201644 IBD Economic modelling III Costs of intestinal ultrasound and colonoscopy to the patient and the hospital
Van Deen W, 201526 411 CD/UC Validation of a 4-question smartphone app to monitor IBD activity III Clinical disease activity indices, QOL, endoscopic score
Van Deen W, 201474 642 IBD Developing and testing multidisciplinary care programmes for IBD patients—case scenarios III Clinical disease activity indices [HBI for CD and partial Mayo score for UC]; quality of life scores; health care expenditures
Van Deen W, 201419 642 IBD Developing and testing multidisciplinary care programmes for IBD patients—case scenarios III Clinical disease activity indices [HBI for CD and partial Mayo score for UC]; quality of life scores; health care expenditures
Velayos FS, 201353 CD Decision analytical model III Cost per QALY gained
Yen L, 201373 UC Budget impact model III Direct costs

CD, Crohn’s disease; CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; ED, emergency department; ER, emergency room; HBI, Harvey-Bradshaw Index; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBDQ, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; ICER, incremental cost effectiveness ratio; NMB, net monetary benefit; NNT, number needed to treat; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; QOL, quality of life; PHQ9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SF-36, Short-Form 36; SIBDQ, Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; UC, ulcerative colitis; UCAI, Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index.

aClassification as follows: I, prospective RCT; II, observational/database study; III, modelling/other.

bFive publications published since the search was conducted; identified by the authors as relevant to the review topic.