Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Nano. 2019 Jul 9;13(8):8609–8617. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02771

Table 1.

TD-immunoassay and conventional ELISA for different concentrations of PCT spiked in sera

PCT
Concentration
(pg/mL)
TD-immunoassay* (pg/mL)
(This work)
Recovery
(%)
Replicates Conventional
ELISA (pg/mL)
Recovery
(%)
Replicates
1.9 1.8±0.3 95.7±19.7 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
3.9 4.0±0.5 103.4±11.8 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
7.8 8.6±0.5 110.7±7.2 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
20 21.4±0.4 107.0±2.1 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
31.3 36.3±4.0 115.9±12.8 3 29.6±6.5 94.6±14.3 3
200 215.7±30.0 95.5±15.0 3 197.6±7.8 98.5±3.9 3
1000 886.3±89.3 88.6±8.9 3 927±97.0 92.7±9.7 3
2000 2010.0±284.8 100.5±14.2 3 1923.2±114.4 96.2±5.7 3
6250 6132.2±790.5 98.1±12.6 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
12500 12463.1±1962 99.7±15.7 3 Not quantifiable Not quantifiable 3
*

Results for TD-immunoassay were obtained the standard curve at 5 min (Supporting Information). Recovery (%) is the measured PCT concentration over the actual PCT concentration, which describes the accuracy of each technique.