Table 5.

Comparison (by one-way ANOVA-F-test) among the different sites for different time points (at baseline, 6 months and 8 months) for osseodensification and traditional drilling technique

Time points	Source of variation	P	F (Cal.)	df
At base line	Between groups (traditional drill method)	0.079**, P>0.05 (NS)	2.448	3
	Between groups (osseodensifying drill technique)	0.172**, P>0.05 (NS)	1.764	3
After 6 months	Between groups (traditional drilling technique)	0.407**, P>0.05 (NS)	0.992	3
	Between groups (osseodensifying drilling technique)	0.017*, P<0.05 (S)	3.872	3
After 8 months	Between groups (traditional drilling technique)	0.017*, P<0.05 (S)	3.869	3
	Between groups (osseodensifying drilling technique)	0.183**, P>0.05 (NS)	1.707	3

**No significant difference between groups, i.e., >0.05, *A significant difference between groups, i.e., <0.05. NS: Not significant, S: Significant, P: Probability, F-cal: F calculated statistics are based on the ratio of mean squares, df: Degree of freedom