Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 18;11(1):20–28. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2020.05

Table 3. Post Hoc Test Comparison Among the 3 Treatment Groups .

Variables Groups Mean Differences Standard Error 95% CI P Value
Upper Lower
MCV m/s Magnetic & drug 3.2 0.97 5.15 1.25 0.002*
Laser & drug 2.69 0.98 4.66 0.73 0.008*
Magnetic & laser 0.59 0.92 2.34 -1.33 0.586
M-ampl mv Magnetic & drug 0.25 0.12 0.48 0.01 0.030*
Laser & drug 0.27 0.11 0.51 0.04 0.023*
Magnetic & laser -0.01 0.11 0.27 0.26 0.892
SCV m/s Magnetic & drug 4.58 2.06 8.71 0.46 0.030*
Laser & drug 4.68 2.08 8.84 0.51 0.028*
Magnetic & laser -0.09 1.95 3.79 -3.98 0.961
S-ampl µv Magnetic & drug 2.45 1.15 4.65 0.26 0.029*
Laser & drug 2.46 1.11 4.68 0.24 0.030*
Magnetic & laser -0.01 1.04 2.06 -2.07 0.993
TRCNSS Magnetic & drug -0.68 0.14 -0.39 -0.96 0.000*
Laser & drug - 0.75 0.14 -0. 47 - 1.04 0.000*
Magnetic & laser 0.07 0.13 0.34 - 0.19 0.571
VAS Magnetic & drug -0.22 0.16 0.09 -0.53 0.169
Laser & drug -0.21 0.16 0.11 -0.53 0.191
Magnetic & laser -0.01 0.15 0.29 -0.31 0.951

MCV m/s, Motor condition velocity in meter per second; M-ampl mv, Motor amplitude in millivolt; SCV m/s, Sensory conduction velocity in meter/second; S-ampl µv, Sensory amplitudes in microvolt; VAS, visual analog scale; TRCNSS, Toronto Clinical Neuropath Scoring System.

* Significance P value < 0.05.