TABLE 3.
Ultimatum Game | ||||
Model summary | R-sq | F | df | p |
0.382 | 10.896 | 8,141 | 0.000 | |
Model | B | t | p | CI |
Constant | 6.050 | 5.904 | 0.000 | [4.025; 8.077] |
Positive outcome | −1.006 | −1.703 | 0.091 | [−2.173; 0.162] |
Negative outcome | 0.889 | 1.487 | 0.139 | [−0.293; 2.071] |
Desire to keep as much of the available budget as possible | −0.600 | −5.705 | 0.000 | [−0.807; −0.392] |
Empathy | 0.016 | 0.123 | 0.902 | [−0.234; 0.265] |
Fear that too low an offer would be rejected | 0.238 | 2.235 | 0.027 | [0.027; 0.449] |
Sense of fairness | 0.285 | 2.495 | 0.014 | [0.059; 0.512] |
Thinking that it would be convenient for the other participant to accept any offer | 0.030 | 0.324 | 0.747 | [−0.156; 0.217] |
Gender | 0.308 | 0.651 | 0.516 | [−0.628; 1.245] |
Total effects of IV on DV (R-sq = 0.131; F = 7.345; df = 3,146; p < 0.001): | ||||
B | t | p | CI | |
Constant | 5.901 | 10.678 | 0.000 | [4.809; 6.993] |
Positive outcome | −1.660 | −2.478 | 0.014 | [−2.984; −0.336] |
Negative outcome | 1.482 | 2.212 | 0.028 | [0.158; 2.806] |
Gender | 0.113 | 0.207 | 0.836 | [−0.968; 1.195] |
Significant relative indirect effect of IV on DV through: Desire to keep as much of the available budget as possible | ||||
Effect | CI | |||
Positive outcome | −0.1559 | [−0.808; 0.431] | ||
Negative outcome | 0.656 | [0.043; 1.400] |