Table 17.
Results of the simulation for reproducing does, where the percentage indicates how often a certain housing system achieved a lower or higher overall welfare impact score compared to the other systems
| Kits | System has higher welfare score (lower welfare) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional cages | Elevated pens | Enriched cages | Floor pens | Organic systems | Outdoor systems | ||
| System has lower welfare score (higher welfare) | Conventional cages | – | 33% | 60% | 65% | 57% | 94% |
| Elevated pens | 67% | – | 75% | 80% | 75% | 98% | |
| Enriched cages | 40% | 25% | – | 54% | 46% | 89% | |
| Floor pens | 35% | 20% | 46% | – | 41% | 87% | |
| Organic systems | 43% | 25% | 54% | 59% | – | 93% | |
| Outdoor systems | 6% | 2% | 11% | 13% | 7% | – | |