Codea | Commodity | Existing MRLb | Proposed MRL | Conclusion/recommendation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Enforcement residue definition: Cyproxanil | ||||
0151000 | Grapes | 0.3 ft 1 | 0.05 | The data gap identified by EFSA concerning three additional trials from SEU in grapes has been addressed. The SEU residue trials suggest an MRL of 0.02 mg/kg. Considering that MRL proposed in the NEU residue trials for grapes evaluated in the MRL review is higher (0.05 mg/kg), a revision of the existing MRL in table and wine grapes from 0.3 to 0.05 mg/kg would be appropriate; the footnote can be deleted |
0151010 | Table grapes | 0.3 ft 1 | 0.05 | |
0151020 | Wine grapes | 0.3 ft 1 | 0.05 | |
0251020 | Lettuces | 0.03 ft 1 | 0.03 | The data gap identified by EFSA concerning two additional trials from SEU in lettuces has been addressed. The MRL is confirmed and the footnote can be deleted |
0252010 | Spinaches | 1 ft 1 | 0.9 | The data gap identified by EFSA concerning four trials from SEU in spinaches has been addressed. The SEU residue trials suggest an MRL of 0.9 mg/kg. Therefore, a revision of the existing MRL in spinaches from 1 to 0.9 mg/kg would be appropriate; the footnote can be deleted |
0300000 | Pulses | 0.05* ft 2 | 0.01* |
Information on storage stability in dry matrices requested as confirmatory data was not provided. Since the data gap was not addressed, risk management action would be appropriate, e.g. revocation of the existing uses on pulses Considering that the validated analytical method assessed in the MRL review reports an LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg for dry matrices, a revision of the existing MRL from 0.05* to 0.01* mg/kg and deletion of the footnote would be appropriate |
0300010 | Beans | 0.05* ft 2 | 0.01* | |
0300020 | Lentils | 0.05* ft 2 | 0.01* | |
0300030 | Peas | 0.05* ft 2 | 0.01* | |
0300040 | Lupins/lupini beans | 0.05* ft 2 | 0.01* | |
0631000 | Herbal infusions (dried flowers) | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | Information on storage stability and analytical methods for enforcement in herbal infusions from flowers requested as confirmatory data was not provided. Since the data gap was not addressed, risk management action would be appropriate, e.g. revocation of the existing uses on herbal infusions (dried flowers). A modification of the existing MRL is not required |
0631010 | Chamomile | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | |
0631020 | Hibiscus/roselle | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | |
0631030 | Rose | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | |
0631040 | Jasmine | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | |
0631050 | Lime/linden | ft 3 | 0.1* | |
0700000 | Hops (dried) | 0.1* ft 3 | 0.1* | Information on storage stability and analytical methods for enforcement in hops requested as confirmatory data was not provided. Since the data gap was not addressed, risk management action would be appropriate, e.g. revocation of the existing uses on hops. A modification of the existing MRL is not required |
* Indicates that the MRL is set at the limit of analytical quantification (LOQ).
Commodity code number according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Existing EU MRL and corresponding footnote on confirmatory data.
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When reviewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 8 October 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gap No 3).
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on storage stability as unavailable. When reviewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 8 October 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gap No 2).
ft 1 The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on storage stability and analytical methods as unavailable. When re‐viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 8 October 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Footnote related to data gap No 1 and 2).