Table 1.
Metrics | Sham Saline |
RUPP Saline |
Sham SynB1 -ELP (50 mg/kg/ d) |
RUPP SynB1 -ELP (50 mg/kg /d) |
Sham Free p50i (2 mg/k g/d) |
RUPP Free p50i (2 mg/kg/ d) |
Sham SynB1 -ELP- p50i (50 mg/kg /d) |
RUPP SynB1 -ELP- p50i (50 mg/kg /d) |
Sham SynB1 -ELP- p50i (75 mg/kg /d) |
RUPP SynB1 -ELP- p50i (75 mg/kg /d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal Body Weight (g) | 291 ± 23 | 262 ± 15* | 281 ± 13 | 263 ± 12 | 297 ± 16 | 264 ± 25* | 301 ± 10 | 271 ± 19* | 293 ± 21 | 266 ± 22* |
Maternal MAP (mmHg) | 100 ± 13 | 120 ± 11* | 99 ± 10 | 123 ± 6* | 103 ± 10 | 115 ± 9 | 98 ± 9 | 111 ± 5 | 92 ± 12 | 112 ± 10* |
Maternal Heart Weight (g) | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.10 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.77 ± 0.12 | 0.86 ± 0.11 |
Maternal Kidney Weight (g) | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | 0.84 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.82 ± 0.1 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.1* |
Total Litter Size (GD14, pre-surgery) | 11.3 ± 1.8 | 11.8 ± 1.5 | 10.7 ± 0.9 | 11.1 ± 1.5 | 11.3 ± 1.0 | 11.7 ± 1.2 | 11.4 ± 1.6 | 12.0 ± 1.5 | 10.7 ± 1.5 | 12.1 ± 1.8 |
Reabsorption Rate (%) | 5.9 ± 10.1 | 69.5 ± 14.2* | 17.5 ± 18.8 | 76.7 ± 16.2* | 9.7 ± 10.2 | 66.6 ± 11.7* | 4.8 ± 7.3 | 70.8 ± 18.9* | 12.6 ± 20.1 | 68.3 ± 18.4* |
Placental Weight (g) | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.60 ± 0.10 |
Fetal Weight (g) | 2.56 ± 0.20 | 2.43 ± 0.20 | 2.51 ± 0.29 | 2.24 ± 0.28 | 2.57 ± 0.32 | 2.22 ± 0.28 | 2.47 ± 0.15 | 2.33 ± 0.20 | 2.55 ± 0.19 | 2.46 ± 0.25 |
Placental Efficiency | 4.15 ± 0.40 | 4.16 ± 0.59 | 4.27 ± 0.51 | 4.32 ± 0.76 | 4.10 ± 0.32 | 4.20 ± 0.55 | 4.54 ± 0.45 | 4.35 ± 0.78 | 4.14 ± 0.26 | 4.17 ± 0.61 |
Mean ± SD are shown.
Statically significant difference between Sham and RUPP operated rats with the same test agent treatment were assessed using a two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison of all groups pair-wise.