Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Dec 11;31(2):113–126. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01256-1

Table 3.

Multivariable Diet Adjusted Percent Change in Metabolite Concentrations for Categories of Alcohol Consumptiona

Drinks per Week
0 >0 and <1 ≥1 and <5 ≥5 and <10 ≥10 and ≤40

N 17 41 81 46 26
Sarcosine
 % change −5.44 ref −1.90 21.49 138.02
 95% CIb −39.36, 47.43 −27.23, 32.24 −14.97, 73.57 55.52, 264.29
 Pvalue 0.815 0.905 0.312 <0.001
Eicosapentaenoate
 % change −1.56 ref 10.46 23.52 59.87
 95% CI −26.80, 32.39 −9.50, 34.80 −2.64, 56.71 20.36, 112.36
 Pvalue 0.921 0.355 0.101 0.002
4-Androsten-3beta,17beta-diol monosulfate
 % change −8.43 ref 6.01 50.68 97.88
 95% CI −38.58, 36.53 −18.96, 38.66 9.32, 107.67 34.96, 190.15
 Pvalue 0.682 0.687 0.019 0.001
4-Androsten-3beta,17beta-diol disulfate
 % change 10.58 ref 3.13 53.52 123.64
 95% CI −26.31, 65.92 −21.50, 35.48 10.82, 112.68 51.60, 229.93
 Pvalue 0.646 0.834 0.015 <0.001
Gamma-CEHC
 % change −13.26 ref −27.84 −33.63 −41.50
 95% CI −34.91, 14.89 −40.75, −13.19 −47.44, −17.04 −55.72, −23.68
 Pvalue 0.355 0.002 0.001 <0.001
2-Methylcitrate
 % change −4.85 ref −7.58 −3.25 19.51
 95% CI −17.84, 9.56 −16.03, 1.90 −13.96, 8.41 4.09, 37.14
 Pvalue 0.522 0.133 0.595 0.017
a

Results from linear mixed effects regression of individual metabolite concentrations on alcohol intake modeled as a factor with 5 levels and adjusted as described in Table 2 footnote c.

b

CI=confidence interval