Table 32.
Country | N | MDR patterns of isolates exhibiting combined resistance to CIP and CTX (number of isolates) | Microbiological Combined Resistance to CIP and CTXa | Clinical Combined Resistance to CIP and CTXb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | %r | n | %r | |||
Belgium | 176 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐SMX‐TMP (1) | 5 | 2.8 | 1 | 0.6 |
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (2) | ||||||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TMP (1) | ||||||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐TET (1) | ||||||
Czech Republic | 180 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐TMP (1) | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.6 |
Germany | 227 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TMP (2) | 3 | 1.3 | 2 | 0.9 |
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐TET (1) | ||||||
Ireland | 203 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET (1) | 2 | 1 | ||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐GEN‐NAL‐TMP (1) | ||||||
Italy | 170 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET (1) | 1 | 0.6 | ||
Latvia | 149 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐GEN‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | 1 | 0.7 | ||
Poland | 213 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | 2 | 0.9 | ||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐SMX‐TMP (1) | ||||||
Portugal | 142 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | 3 | 2.1 | 1 | 0.7 |
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | ||||||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐TET (1) | ||||||
Romania | 170 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐GEN‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | 3 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.6 |
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | ||||||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐SMX‐TET (1) | ||||||
Slovenia | 85 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL (1) | 1 | 1.2 | 1 | 1.2 |
Spain | 170 | AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CHL‐CIP‐NAL‐SMX‐TET‐TMP (1) | 2 | 1.2 | ||
AMP‐CTX‐CAZ‐CIP‐NAL‐TET‐TMP (1) | ||||||
Total (11 MSs) | 1,885 | – | 24 | 1.3 | 7 | 0.4 |
ECOFFs: epidemiological cut‐off values; MSs: Member States; N: number of isolates tested; GEN: gentamicin; CHL: chloramphenicol; AMP: ampicillin; CTX: cefotaxime; CAZ: Ceftazidime; TGC: tigecycline; NAL: nalidixic acid; CIP: ciprofloxacin; COL: colistin; SMX: sulfamethoxazole; TMP: trimethoprim; TET: tetracycline.
applying ECOFFs.
applying CBPs.