| Crop and/or situation | NEU, SEU, MS or country | F G or Ia | Pests or group of pests controlled | Preparation | Application | Application rate per treatment | PHI (days)d | Remarks | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typeb |
Conc. a.s. |
Method kind | Range of growth stages & seasonc |
number min–max |
Interval between application (min) |
kg a.s./hL min–max |
Water L/ha min–max |
Rate | Unit | ||||||
| 1. Citrus fruits | EU | I | Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, Diaporthe citri, Diplodia spp., Alternaria citri, Botrytis spp., Phomopsis spp., Diplodia natalensis | EC | 500 g/L | Post‐harvest, drenching/dipping | N/A | 1 | – | 0.05 | – | – | – | Waiting period 0 days | GAP assessed in the MRL review. Safety concern identified for grapefruits and oranges, but new data received to attempt refinement of the risk assessment |
| 2. Citrus fruits | EU | I | EC | 500 g/L | Post‐harvest, spraying (low volume) | N/A | 1 | – | 0.15 | – | – | – | Waiting period 0 days | GAP was reported in the MRL review, but not assessed as it was not the most critical GAP | |
| 3. Citrus fruits | EU | I | EC | 500 g/L | Post‐harvest, waxing | N/A | 1 | – | 0.2 | – | – | – | Waiting period 0 days | A more cGAP was assessed in the MRL review (rate of 0.3 kg/hL) for grapefruits and oranges | |
| 4. Apples/Pears | EU | I | Post‐harvest fungi | SL | 75 g/L | Post‐harvest, drenching/dipping | N/A | 1 | – | 0.0375 | – | – | Waiting period 0 days | A less cGAP assessed in the MRL review (with waiting period of 60 days) and in the original version of the evaluation report with safety concern identified | |
| 5. Pears | EU | I | Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, Gloeosporium album | SL | 75 g/L | Post‐harvest, drenching/dipping | Within 16 h after harvest | 1 | – | 0.025 | – | – | Waiting period 0 days | GAP assessed in the MRL review. Safety concern identified | |
| 6. Potatoes | EU | I | Silver scurf, Gangrene, Skin spot, Dry rot (Fusarium) | SL | 100 g/L | Post‐harvest, spraying | N/A | 1 | – | – | – | 0.015 | g/t | Waiting period 0 days | According to the evaluation report, the intended GAP was 0.105 kg a.s./ha, which was considered equivalent to 0.015 kg a.s./t; the same GAP was assessed in the MRL review for which a consumer safety concern was identified |
| 7. Bananas | EU | I | Post‐harvest fungi | SG | 750 g/kg | Post‐harvest, dipping/drenching/spraying | 1 | – | 0.06 | – | – | – | Waiting period 35 days | GAP assessed in the MRL review. Safety concerns and data gap identified | |
GAP: good agricultural practice; MRL: maximum residue level; NEU: northern European Union; SEU: southern European Union; MS: Member State; a.s.: active substance; EC: emulsifiable concentrate; SL: soluble concentrate; cGAP: critical GAP; SG: water‐soluble granule.
Outdoor or field use (F), greenhouse application (G) or indoor application (I).
CropLife International Technical Monograph no 2, 6th Edition. Revised May 2008. Catalogue of pesticide formulation types and international coding system.
Growth stage range from first to last treatment (BBCH Monograph, Growth Stages of Plants, 1997, Blackwell, ISBN 3‐8263‐3152‐4), including, where relevant, information on season at time of application.
PHI: minimum preharvest interval.
GAPs highlighted in grey: GAPs already assessed by EFSA in the framework of the MRL review and not subject to reassessment in this reasoned opinion.