Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 5;16(4):e05235. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5235

Table 5.

Qualitative evaluation of influence of uncertainties on the dietary exposure estimate

Sources of uncertainties Directiona
Consumption data: different methodologies/representativeness/underreporting/misreporting/no portion size standard +/–
Use of data from food consumption surveys covering only a few days to estimate high percentiles (95th) long‐term (chronic) exposure +
Correspondence of reported use levels and analytical data to the food items in the EFSA Comprehensive Database: uncertainties to which types of food the levels refer +/–
Uncertainty in possible national differences in use levels of food categories +/–
Concentration data:
  • use levels considered applicable to all foods within the entire food category

  • analytical data not fully representative of foods on the EU market (coming from 4 MSs)

  • reliability of the data set

+

+/–

Food categories selected for the exposure assessment:
  • exclusion of food categories due to missing FoodEx linkage (n = 3)

  • 20 food categories taken into account in the refined exposure assessment scenario

+/–

Refined exposure assessment scenario:
  • 3 FCs with levels coming from analytical data: use of middle‐bound (MB) LOD/LOQ values for left‐censored data

  • exposure calculations based on the maximum or mean levels (reported use from industries or analytical data)

+/–

+/–

MS: Member State; FC: food category; LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantification.

a

+, uncertainty with potential to cause overestimation of exposure; –, uncertainty with potential to cause underestimation of exposure.