Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;16(2):e05182. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5182

Table 66.

Presumptive ESBL and AmpC‐producing indicator E. coli isolates from broiler flocks collected within the routine monitoring and subjected to supplementary testing (Panel 2) in 2016a

Country Presumptive resistance phenotype
Total number tested P1 Total number tested P2 ESBLb ESBL only CLA/CTX SYNc ESBL only CLA/CAZ SYNd AmpCe AmpC + ESBLf CPsg
n %h n %h n %h n %h n %h n %h
Austria 170 1 1 0.6
Belgium 151 1 1 0.7
Bulgaria 111 4 4 3.6 4 3.6
Croatia 85 4 2 2.4 1 1.2 2 2.4
Cyprus 85 5 2 2.4 2 2.4 3 3.5 1 1.2
Czech Republici 227 1
Denmark 186 1 1 0.5
Finland 184 1 1 0.5
Francei 188 7 6 3.2 2 1.1
Germany 177 2 2 1.1 0. 1 0.6 1 0.6
Greece 170 4 1 0.6 1 0.6 3 1.8
Hungary 170 12 4 2.4 0. 1 0.6 8 4.7
Ireland 170 4 4 2.4 2 1.2
Italyj 171 9 8 4.7 2 1.2 1 0.6 2 1.2 1 0.6
Latvia 100 8 8 8.0 7 7.0 4 4.0 4 4.0
Lithuania 100 52 17 17.0 3 3.0 36 36.0 1 1.0
Netherlands 300 3 2 0.7 1 0.3 1 0.3
Poland 173 6 5 2.9 5 2.9 4 2.3
Portugali 161 10 9 5.6
Romania 840 29 14 1.7 9 1.1 15 1.8 1 0.1
Sloveniai 85 5 2 2.4 1 1.2 3 3.5 v
Spain 171 16 14 8.2 4 2.3 1 0.6 3 1.8 1 0.6
Swedenj 175 3 3 1.7 2 1.1
Total (23 MSs) 4,350 188 108 2.5 40 0.9 4 0.1 89 2.0 13 2.0 1 0.02

ESBL: extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase; n = isolates with this phenotype; %: percentage of isolates from the total tested; SYN: synergy; CTX: cefotaxime; CAZ: ceftazidime; CLA: clavulanate. MSs: Member States.

a

According to EUCAST Guidelines (EUCAST, 2013), only isolates showing an MIC > 1 mg/L for cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime (screening breakpoint) were considered (see Materials and methods Section 2).

b

All isolates showing clavulanate synergy with cefotaxime, ceftazidime or with both compounds, suggesting the presence of an ESBL (independently of the presence of other mechanisms).

c

Isolates showing synergy with cefotaxime only, suggesting the presence of an ESBL with cefotaximase activity.

d

Isolates showing synergy with ceftazidime only, suggesting the presence of an ESBL with ceftazidimase activity.

e

Isolates with microbiological resistance to cefoxitin, suggesting the presence of an AmpC enzyme (independently of the presence of other mechanisms).

f

Isolates showing synergy with cefotaxime or ceftazidime and with microbiological resistance to cefoxitin, suggesting the presence of ESBL and AmpC enzymes in the same isolate. These isolates are also included in the ESBL and AmpC columns.

g

Isolates with microbiological meropenem resistance.

h

Percentage of the total number of E. coli isolates tested (with Panel 1).

i

It includes isolates microbiologically resistant to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime but with MIC ≤ 1 mg/L for both antimicrobials, suggesting the presence of other mechanisms (as stated above, they were not further classified).

j

Molecular data were reported by: Italy with 5 isolates CTX‐M and one isolate SHV; Sweden: 3 isolates CTX‐M‐1.