Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;16(2):e05182. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5182

Table 76.

Overview of results using RT‐PCR screening for carbapenemase‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae in faecal samples of livestock in 2015 and 2016 in the Netherlands

Animal species Number of samples screened for CPE Number of samples positive for CPE Prevalence (%) (95% IC)
Broilers 1,000 0 0 (0–0.37)
Layers 193 0 0 (0–1.89)
Ducks 100 0 0 (0–3.62)
Dairy cattle 602 0 0 (0–0.61)
Veal calves 605 0 0 (0–0.61)
Slaughter pigs 600 0 0 (0–0.61)

Comment provided by the Netherlands: Wang et al. described a PCR‐based method to detect bla NDM directly from faecal samples and compared the results to culture diagnostics (Wang, 2017). They demonstrated that bla NDM was present in 165/330 (50%) samples from commercial farms, whereas culture‐based methods detected carbapenemase‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in 83/330 (25%) samples only.

Table 76.

Overview of results using RT‐PCR screening for carbapenemase‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae in faecal samples of livestock in 2015 and 2016 in the Netherlands

Animal species Number of samples screened for CPE Number of samples positive for CPE Prevalence (%) (95% IC)
Broilers 1,000 0 0 (0–0.37)
Layers 193 0 0 (0–1.89)
Ducks 100 0 0 (0–3.62)
Dairy cattle 602 0 0 (0–0.61)
Veal calves 605 0 0 (0–0.61)
Slaughter pigs 600 0 0 (0–0.61)

Comment provided by the Netherlands: Wang et al. described a PCR‐based method to detect bla NDM directly from faecal samples and compared the results to culture diagnostics (Wang, 2017). They demonstrated that bla NDM was present in 165/330 (50%) samples from commercial farms, whereas culture‐based methods detected carbapenemase‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in 83/330 (25%) samples only.