Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;16(2):e05125. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125

Table 26.

Exposure routes and the definition of the EREQs for all life stages of amphibian populations (SPG: population persistence) in the aquatic environment (in‐field, and edge‐of‐field)

Exposure route Source/location EREQ Temporal dimension of EREQ Remarks
Contact exposure Pond water Spray drift Concentration dissolved in pond water Maximum or maximum moving TWAa over specified time window for AMA or LAGDA test in the relevant period of the year (length of the time window depends on the endpoint considered, e.g. growth or sex ratio) Important route for in‐field ponds, less important for edge‐of‐field ponds located not immediately adjacent to crops
Runoff Important route, also for edge‐of‐field ponds receiving runoff water from treated fields
Drainage Possibly an important route
Atmospheric deposition Minor route for in‐field ponds. Negligible route for edge‐of‐field ponds (depending on the substance)
Oral exposure Food, plants, sediment, water The daily mass taken up by individuals of the population. Maximum in relevant period of the year

May be important for a compound with high adsorption capacity such as pyrethroids

No spiked food in AMA and LAGDA tests, therefore the main exposure route in AMA and LAGDA tests is via contact (water)

Breathing Air Expected to be a minor route of exposure compared to contact and oral exposure for juveniles and adults, for aquatic eggs, hatchlings and larvae expected to be unimportant as they do not or hardly breath
a

See the Aquatic Guidance Document (Section 4.5.1 in EFSA, 2013) for criteria when TWA concentrations may be used.