Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;16(8):e05377. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5377

Table 11.

Acute EC50 (95% confidence limit) data for standard and additional aquatic species considered realistic to explore the Tier‐2A effect assessment approach

Species Taxonomy 96‐h EC50 (μg/L)a
1 Daphnia magna Crustacea; Cladocera 0.17 (0.12–0.23)
2 Asellus aquaticus Crustacea; Isopoda 3.43 (2.75–4.26)
3 Gammarus pulex Crustacea; Amphipoda 0.23 (0.20–0.25)
4 Chironomus riparius Insecta; Chironomidae 0.18 (0.07–0.43)
5 Cloeon dipterum Insecta; Ephemeroptera 0.31 (0.26–0.38)
6 Plea minutissima Insecta; Heteroptera 1.29 (0.92–1.80)
Geometric mean 96‐h EC 50 for crustaceans 0.51
Geometric mean 96‐h EC 50 for insects 0.42
a

Note that for Daphnia magna and Chironomus riparius the 48 h endpoint is normally selected for risk assessment but in this case the 96 h endpoints were used.