| Code number | Commodity | Existing EU MRL (mg/kg) | Existing CXL (mg/kg) | Outcome of the review | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRL (mg/kg) | Comment | ||||
|
Enforcement residue definition (existing): imazalil Enforcement residue definition 1 (proposed): imazalil (any ratio of constituent isomers) | |||||
| 110010 | Grapefruits | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 110020 | Oranges | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 110030 | Lemons | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 110040 | Limes | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 110050 | Mandarins | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 130010 | Apples | 2 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 130020 | Pears | 2 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 130030 | Quinces | 2 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededb |
| 130040 | Medlar | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededb |
| 130050 | Loquat | 5 | 5 | – | Further consideration neededb |
| 152000 | Strawberries | 0.05* | 2 | 2 | Recommendedc |
| 153010 | Blackberries | 0.05* | 2 | 2 | Recommendedc |
| 153030 | Raspberries | 0.05* | 2 | 2 | Recommendedc |
| 161060 | Persimmon | 0.05* | 2 | – | Further consideration neededd |
| 163020 | Bananas | 2 | 2 | – | Further consideration neededa |
| 211000 | Potatoes | 3 | 5 | 0.01* | Recommendede |
| 231010 | Tomatoes | 0.5 | – | 0.3 | Recommendedf |
| 231020 | Sweet peppers/bell peppers | 0.05* | – | 0.05 | Further consideration neededg |
| 232010 | Cucumbers | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Recommendedh |
| 232020 | Gherkins | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Recommendedh |
| 232030 | Courgettes | 0.2 | – | 0.1 | Further consideration neededi |
| 233010 | Melons | 2 | 2 | – | Further consideration neededj |
| 500010 | Barley grains | 0.05* | – | 0.01* | Recommendedf |
| 500050 | Oat grains | 0.05* | – | 0.01* | Recommendedf |
| 500070 | Rye grains | 0.05* | – | 0.01* | Recommendedf |
| 500090 | Wheat grains | 0.05* | 0.01* | 0.01* | Recommendedk |
| – | Other commodities of plant or animal origin | See Reg. 750/2010 | – | – | Further consideration neededl |
MRL: maximum residue level; CXL: codex maximum residue limit.
* Indicates that the MRL is set at the limit of quantification.
The previously derived tentative residue definition for risk assessment has been suspended because the toxicological data were insufficient to clearly rule out a genotoxic potential for metabolite R014821. Pending the submission of data required to finalise the hazard characterisation for this metabolite that is expected to occur following post‐harvest treatment of the crop, the risk assessment cannot be finalised and consequently no MRL recommendation was derived. A similar case applies to CXL that were derived from post‐harvest uses. Either a specific LOQ or the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered.
There are no relevant authorisations or import tolerances reported at EU level; CXL is reflecting a post‐harvest use. Thus, pending the finalisation of the hazard characterisation for metabolite R014821, the CXL is not recommended to be taken over in EU legislation. Either a specific LOQ or the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered.
MRL is derived from the existing CXL, which is supported by data and for which no risk to consumers is identified; there are no relevant authorisations or import tolerances reported at EU level.
There are no relevant authorisations or import tolerances reported at EU level; CXL is supported by data but a risk to consumers cannot be excluded. Either a specific LOQ or the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered.
MRL is derived from a GAP evaluated at EU level (fall‐back GAP: seed treatment), which is fully supported by data and for which no risk to consumers is identified; CXL is higher but pending the finalisation of the hazard characterisation for metabolite R014821, the CXL is not recommended to be taken over in EU legislation.
MRL is derived from a GAP evaluated at EU level, which is fully supported by data and for which no risk to consumers is identified; no CXL is available.
GAP evaluated at EU level is not supported by data but no risk to consumers was identified for the existing EU MRL; no CXL is available.
MRL is derived from the existing CXL, which is supported by data and for which no risk to consumers is identified; GAP evaluated at EU level, which is not fully supported by data, leads to a lower tentative MRL.
Tentative MRL is derived from a GAP evaluated at EU level, which is not fully supported by data but for which no risk to consumers was identified; no CXL is available.
The previously derived tentative residue definition for risk assessment has been suspended because the toxicological data were insufficient to clearly rule out a genotoxic potential for metabolite R014821. Pending the submission of data required to finalise the hazard characterisation for this metabolite that is expected to occur following post‐harvest treatment of the crop, the risk assessment cannot be finalised and consequently no MRL recommendation was derived from the post‐harvest use. A similar case applies to CXL that were derived from post‐harvest uses. In addition, the foliar GAP evaluated at EU level is not supported by data and a risk to consumers cannot be excluded for the existing EU MRL. Either a specific LOQ or the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered.
MRL is derived from a GAP evaluated at EU level, which is fully supported by data and for which no risk to consumers is identified; existing CXL is covered by the recommended MRL.
There are no relevant authorisations or import tolerances reported at EU level; no CXL is available. Either a specific LOQ or the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered.