Feed commodity	Median dietary burden		Maximum dietary burden
	Input value (mg/kg)	Comment	Input value (mg/kg)	Comment
Scenario EU1: excluding GAPs with post‐harvest treatment (citrus fruits, apples and potatoes)a. For potatoes, a fall‐back GAP (seed treatment) was considered.
Potato, culls	0.01*	STMRa	0.01*	HRa
Potato, process waste	0.01*	STMRa,b	0.01*	STMRa,b
Potato, dried pulp	0.01*	STMRa,b	0.01*	STMRa,b
Brewer's grain, dried	0.01*	STMRb	0.01*	STMRb
Wheat, distiller's grain (dry)	0.01*	STMRb	0.01*	STMRb
Wheat gluten, meal	0.01*	STMRb	0.01*	STMRb
Wheat, milled by‐products	0.01*	STMRb	0.01*	STMRb
Small grain cereals, grain	0.01*	STMR	0.01*	STMR
Small grain cereals, straw	0.01*	STMR	0.01*	HR

STMR: supervised trials median residue; HR: highest residue.

* Indicates that the input value is proposed at the limit of quantification.

^aFor citrus fruits, apples and potatoes, the critical GAPs are post‐harvest treatments. However, as risk assessment could not be derived from GAPs with post‐harvest treatments, no input values are available for the feed items derived from these GAPs. For potatoes, risk assessment values could be derived from a fall‐back GAP (seed treatment).

^bFor processed commodities of potatoes (process waste and dried pulp) and cereals (brewer's and distiller's grain, gluten and milled by‐products), no default processing factor was applied because imazalil is applied as a seed treatment and residues are expected to be below the LOQ. Concentration of residues in these commodities is therefore not expected.