Table 11.
Contradictory resultsa
| Plant species | Contradicting methods | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Heteromeles arbutifolia (Rosaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Hibiscus syriacus (Malvaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | McGaha et al. (2007) |
| Juglans californica (Juglandaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Phyla nodiflora (Verbenaceae) | ELISA and PCR‐based methods POS vs Other immunological technique NEG | Buzombo et al. (2006) |
| Pistacia vera (Anacardiaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Platanus racemosa (Platanaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Rubus trivialis (Rosaceae) | ELISA and PCR‐based methods POS vs Other immunological technique NEG | Buzombo et al. (2018) |
| Schinus molle (Anacardiaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Solanum elaeagnifolium (Solanaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG | Costa et al. (2004) |
| Tillandsia usneoides (Bromeliaceae) | ELISA POS vs PCR‐based methods NEG and Other immunological technique NEG | Buzombo et al. (2006) |
a
Complete list of contradicting results is available in Appendix D.