| Code number b | Commodity | Existing EU MRL (mg/kg) | Outcome of the assessment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRL (mg/kg) | Comment | |||
| Enforcement residue definition: acetamiprid | ||||
| 130010 | Apples | 0.8 | 0.4 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 130020 | Pears | 0.8 | 0.4 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 140030 | Peaches | 0.8 | 0.2 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 242020 | Head cabbages | 0.7 | 0.4 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 243010 | Chinese cabbages | 1.5 | – | A fall‐back MRL could not be proposedd |
| 243020 | Kales | 1.5 | – | A fall‐back MRL could not be proposedd |
| 251020 | Lettuces | 3 | 1.5 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 251030 | Escaroles/broad‐leaved endives | 1.5 | 0.4 | Tentative fall‐back MRL is proposede |
| 252010 | Spinaches | 5 | 0.6 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 252020 | Purslanes | 3 | 0.6 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 252030 | Chards/beet leaves | 3 | 0.6 | Fall‐back MRL is proposedc |
| 270030 | Celeries | 1.5 | – | A fall‐back MRL could not be proposedf |
| 161030 | Table olives | 0.9 | 3 | New intended EU uses are sufficiently supported by data and no risk for consumers has been identified |
| 402010 | Olives for oil production | 0.9 | 3 | |
| 500010 | Barley grains | 0.01a | 0.05 | |
| 500050 | Oat grains | 0.01a | 0.05 | |
| – | Other products of plant origin | See Regulation 2017/626 | See Regulation 2017/626 | Existing MRLs can be maintainedg |
| Enforcement residue definition: sum of acetamiprid and N‐desmethyl acetamiprid, expressed as acetamiprid | ||||
| – | Other products of animal origin | See Regulation 2017/626 | See Regulation 2017/626 | Existing MRLs can be maintainedh |
MRL: maximum residue level.
Indicates that the MRL is set at the limit of quantification.
Commodity code number, as listed in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
The existing EU MRL was identified as a potential MRL of concern. Data supporting a fall‐back MRL were submitted by MSs and no risk to consumers is identified for this fall‐back MRL.
The existing EU MRL was identified as a potential MRL of concern. No uses are currently authorised in EU that could be considered to derive a fall‐back MRL. EFSA proposes to lower the MRL to the appropriate LOQ and to withdraw the relevant authorisations within the EU.
The existing EU MRL was identified as a potential MRL of concern. Data supporting a fall‐back MRL were submitted by MSs and no risk to consumers is identified for this fall‐back MRL. Nevertheless the derived fall‐back MRL should be confirmed by the submission of additional data.
The existing EU MRL was identified as a potential MRL of concern. Residue data supporting the fall‐back GAPs were not available and a fall‐back MRL cannot be derived. EFSA proposes to lower the MRL to the appropriate LOQ and to withdraw the relevant authorisations within the EU.
The existing EU MRL was not identified as a potential MRL of concern.
The existing EU MRL was not identified as a potential MRL of concern. Moreover the withdrawal of the most critical existing uses on kale and apples and the intended uses on barley and oats are not expected to have an impact on the MRLs calculated for livestock.