Table 13.

Estimated P95 and mean exposure to the sum of ZEN, α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL^a

Species		Diet concentration μg/kg dry matter		Exposureμg/day		Exposureμg/kg bw		% of exposure (μg/kg bw) from modified forms
		P95	Mean	P95	Mean	P95	Mean	P95	Mean
Dairy: high yieldinga	LB	25.3	6.49	525	134	0.81	0.21	0	0
	UB	61.5	44.2	1,272	916	1.96	1.41	58.7	81.6
Dairy: high yieldingb	LB	223	45.0	4,632	932	7.13	1.43	0	0
	UB	259	94.2	5,379	1,950	8.28	3.00	13.9	49.3
Fattening beef cattlea	LB	25.4	2.52	121	24.2	0.30	0.06	0	0
	UB	25.7	16.7	247	159	0.62	0.40	51.6	77.5
Fattening beef cattleb	LB	223	57.1	2,820	548	7.05	1.37	0	0
	UB	306	87.5	2,945	839	7.36	2.10	4.2	31.4
Sheep: lactatingb	LB	41.3	7.78	78.5	14.8	1.31	0.25	25.2	28.0
	UB	82.9	51.0	157	97.0	2.62	1.62	62.6	85.8
Sheep: lactatingc	LB	206	39.9	392	75.8	6.54	1.26	24.9	24.6
	UB	248	92.7	471	176	7.86	2.94	37.5	65.6
Goats: lactatingb , d	LB		1.44		3.03		0.05		0
	UB		1.99		4.18		0.07		0
Goats: lactatingc , d	LB		56.1		117		1.96		0
	UB		72.8		152		2.55		20.0

bw: body weight; LB: lower bound; UB: upper bound; P95: 95th percentile.

^aThe contributions from α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL have been corrected for their potencies relative to ZEN (see Section 1.3.1).

^bExposure to fresh grass and species‐specific compound feed only (i.e. assumes no exposure to ZEN from forages).

^cExposure to grass hay and species‐specific compound feed.

^dInsufficient samples available to estimate P95 exposure.