Table 14.

Estimated P95 and mean exposure to the sum of ZEN, α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL by ruminants and horses, derived from concentrations in individual feed materials and their relative proportions in diets^a

Species		Diet concentration μg/kg dry matter		Exposure μg/day		Exposure μg/kg bw		% of exposure (μg/kg bw) from modified forms
		P95	Mean	P95	Mean	P95	Mean	P95	Mean
Dairy cows: maize silage‐based diet	LB	777	117	21,223	3,191	32.6	4.91	0	0
	UB	788	124	21,505	3,397	33.1	5.23	0.6	2.5
Beef cattle: cereal‐based diet	LB	16.2	10.6	162	106	0.41	0.26	22.0	23.1
	UB	46.3	55.5	463	555	1.16	1.39	54.3	80.6
Beef cattle: maize silage‐based diet	LB	795	105	5,250	695	17.5	2.32	0	0
	UB	826	140	5,454	924	18.2	3.08	3.7	22.7
Beef cattle: straw‐based diet	LB	15.6	8.54	125	68.2	0.42	0.23	0	0
	UB	95.2	102	761	820	2.54	2.73	70.9	85.3
Fattening goatsb	LB	90.3	7.23	134	10.8	3.36	0.27	0.3	22.2
	UB	91.2	33.0	137	49.5	3.41	1.24	1.8	76.6
Fattening goatsc	LB	288	45.8	432	68.7	10.8	1.72	0	3.5
	UB	289	83.0	434	124	10.9	3.11	0.6	42.8
Horsesb	LB	23.0	14.8	207	133	0.46	0.30	23.9	40.0
	UB	54.3	48.0	489	432	1.09	0.96	65.1	76.0
Horsesc	LB	188	46.9	1,695	422	3.77	0.94	3.2	11.7
	UB	219	89.7	1,977	807	4.39	1.79	15.9	50.3

bw: body weight; LB: lower bound; UB: upper bound; P95: 95th percentile.

^aThe contributions from α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL have been corrected for their potencies relative to ZEN (see Section 1.3.1)

^bExposure to species‐specific compound feed only (i.e. assumes no exposure to ZEN from forages)

^cAssumes that the diet contains 50% grass hay