Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;15(7):e04851. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4851

Table 16.

Estimated P95 and mean exposure to the sum of ZEN, α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL for rabbits, farmed fish and mink derived from concentrations in individual feed materials and their relative proportions in dietsa

Species   Diet concentration μg/kg dry matter Exposure μg/day Exposure μg/kg bw % of exposure (μg/kg bw) from modified forms
P95 Mean P95 Mean P95 Mean P95 Mean
Salmonids LB 24.6 4.13 0.99 0.17 0.49 0.08 0 0
UB 25.4 6.68 1.02 0.27 0.51 0.13 2.0 0
Carp LB 112 21.5 2.48 0.47 2.48 0.47 0 0
UB 132 46.4 2.89 1.02 2.89 1.02 14.2 38.2
Rabbits LB 17.8 16.5 2.67 2.48 1.34 1.24 36.6 38.7
UBb 76.2 80.4 11.4 12.1 5.71 6.03 76.4 81.6
Mink LB 38.5 8.50 2.89 0.64 1.40 0.31 0 0
UB 39.5 9.88 2.96 0.74 1.43 0.36 1.4 8.3

bw: body weight; LB: lower bound; UB: upper bound; P95: 95th percentile.

a

The contributions from α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL have been corrected for their RPFs (see Section 1.3.1).

b

The Estimated mean exposure is higher than the P95 due to the very skewed distribution of the data.