Table 16.
Estimated P95 and mean exposure to the sum of ZEN, α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL for rabbits, farmed fish and mink derived from concentrations in individual feed materials and their relative proportions in dietsa
Species | Diet concentration μg/kg dry matter | Exposure μg/day | Exposure μg/kg bw | % of exposure (μg/kg bw) from modified forms | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P95 | Mean | P95 | Mean | P95 | Mean | P95 | Mean | ||
Salmonids | LB | 24.6 | 4.13 | 0.99 | 0.17 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 |
UB | 25.4 | 6.68 | 1.02 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 2.0 | 0 | |
Carp | LB | 112 | 21.5 | 2.48 | 0.47 | 2.48 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 |
UB | 132 | 46.4 | 2.89 | 1.02 | 2.89 | 1.02 | 14.2 | 38.2 | |
Rabbits | LB | 17.8 | 16.5 | 2.67 | 2.48 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 36.6 | 38.7 |
UBb | 76.2 | 80.4 | 11.4 | 12.1 | 5.71 | 6.03 | 76.4 | 81.6 | |
Mink | LB | 38.5 | 8.50 | 2.89 | 0.64 | 1.40 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 |
UB | 39.5 | 9.88 | 2.96 | 0.74 | 1.43 | 0.36 | 1.4 | 8.3 |
bw: body weight; LB: lower bound; UB: upper bound; P95: 95th percentile.
The contributions from α‐ZAL, β‐ZAL, ZAN, α‐ZEL and β‐ZEL have been corrected for their RPFs (see Section 1.3.1).
The Estimated mean exposure is higher than the P95 due to the very skewed distribution of the data.