Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 16;15(10):e04991. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4991

Table D.15.

Estimates for HPAI provided in the EKEs by working group members or event participants

Variable Description Question description Clade LB Q1 Median Q3 UB Estimate done by
MNWB Total number of migratory non‐water birds entering the EU during fall–winter migratory season through the north‐east border Total number of migratory non‐water birds entering the EU during fall–winter migratory season through the north‐east border. Number of birds in 1,000 units 2.3.4.4 175,000 390,000 515,000 590,000 700,000 Semi‐formal EKE
Mslength Length (in days) of the fall–winter migratory season for wild birds entering the EU through the north‐east border Average over last 100 year of length in days of the fall–winter migratory season for wild bird of the water bird group entering in EU through north‐east border 2.3.4.4     125     Data
MWB Total number of migratory water birds entering the EU during fall–winter migratory season through the north‐east border Total number of migratory water birds entering the EU during fall–winter migratory season through the north‐east border. Number of birds in 1,000 units 2.3.4.4 17,500 26,500 37,250 46,500 55,000 Semi‐formal EKE
NWBin Number of non‐water birds landing into a holding Estimate the average number, over 2016–2017 fall–winter migratory season (5 months duration), of non‐water birds (migratory and/or residential) that will land on any holding surface of a ‘worst‐case’ poultry holding per day 2.3.4.4 200 400 750 2,000 10,000 Workshop
Prob(contactNWB,NWB)1 Probability that a non‐water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 1 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 1 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) and in other potential area in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 2 14.5 175 350 1,750 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactNWB,NWB)10 Probability that a non‐water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 10 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 10 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) and in other potential area in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 17.5 130 1,500 2,700 7,000 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactNWB,NWB)100 Probability that a non‐water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 100 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 100 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) and in other potential area in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 150 1,450 5,498.5 6,249 9,500 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactNWB,WB)1 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 1 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 1 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 1 10 51 210 600 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactNWB,WB)10 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 10 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 10 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 7.5 65 485 1,475 4,000 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactNWB,WB)100 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 100 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 100 infected non‐water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 75 525 3,475 5,749 8,500 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,NWB)1 Probability that a non‐water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 1 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 1 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 3 16 112.5 275 900 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,NWB)10 Probability that a non‐water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 10 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 10 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 30 160 1,125 2,750 8,999.5 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,NWB)100 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 100 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 100 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 100 1,000 5,998.5 6,499 7,499.5 Semi‐formal EKE
п_MWB Prevalence of infected HPAIV water birds at the moment they cross the EU border Think of a population of 1,000,000 migratory water birds crossing the EU north‐east border during the 2016/2017 fall–winter migration season. Estimate the number of these birds that will be HPAI H5N8 infected at the time they cross the north‐east EU border 2.3.2.1c 0 15 100 500 1,000 Semi‐formal EKE
п_MWB Prevalence of infected HPAIV water birds at the moment they cross the EU border Think of a population of 1,000,000 migratory water birds crossing the EU north‐east border during the 2016/2017 fall–winter migration season. Estimate the number of these birds that will be HPAI H5N8 infected at the time they cross the north‐east EU border 2.2.1.2 0 2 8 25 200 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,WB)1 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 1 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 1 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) or in a water body in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 1.5 19.5 150 400 1,500 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedWB Duration in days of the shedding period in water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected water bird will shed infectious virus 2.3.2.1c 0 2 4 6 14 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedWB Duration in days of the shedding period in water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected water bird will shed infectious virus 2.2.1.2 0 2 4 6 14 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,WB)10 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 10 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 10 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) or in a water body in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 12 170 1,450 3,500 6,499.5 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedNWB Duration in days of the shedding period in non‐water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected non‐water bird will shed the infectious virus 2.3.2.1c 0 1 3 5 10 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedNWB Duration in days of the shedding period in non‐water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected non‐water bird will shed the infectious virus 2.2.1.2 0 1 3 5 10 Semi‐formal EKE
Prob(contactWB,WB)100 Probability that a water bird comes in contact with the excretions of 100 infected water bird in a foraging area Think of a population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might come in contact with the excretions shedded by 100 infected water bird in a foraging area (see definition above) or in a water body in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 112.5 1,275 6,498.5 7,249 7,499.5 Semi‐formal EKE
π_MWB Prevalence of infected HPAIV water birds at the moment they cross the EU border Think of a population of 1,000,000 migratory water birds crossing the EU north‐east border during the 2016/2017 fall–winter migration season. Estimate the number of these birds that will be HPAI H5N8 infected at the time they cross the north‐east EU border 2.3.4.4 0 16.94 114.42 463.67 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb0 inf)1 Probability for a worst‐case holding to get the infection given the presence of 1 HPAI‐infected wild bird Think of 10,000 worst‐case poultry holdings (see definition above). Given exposure of the holding to 1 H5N8 infected wild bird, estimate the number of worst‐case poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 0.58 4.03 18.84 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb0 inf)10 Probability for a worst‐case holding to get the infection given the presence of 10 HPAI‐infected wild bird Think of 10,000 worst‐case poultry holdings (see definition above). Given exposure of the holding to 10 H5N8 infected wild bird, estimate the number of worst‐case poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 5.19 23.78 112.99 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb0 inf)100 Probability for a worst‐case holding to get the infection given the presence of 100 HPAI‐infected wild bird Think of 10,000 worst‐case poultry holdings (see definition above). Given exposure of the holding to 100 H5N8 infected wild bird, estimate the number of worst‐case poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 43.17 183.44 854.36 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb1 inf) Probability for a holding to get the infection given the presence of 100 HPAI‐infected wild bird if access by wild birds to the water bodies was prevented Consider the scenario described in Q21c and take the median number of worst‐case poultry holdings you estimated as a starting point for this question. If access by poultry (including waterfowl) to the water bodies was prevented in these poultry holdings, what would be the number of such poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 16.94 61.31 190.15 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb2 inf) Probability for a holding to get the infection given the presence of 100 HPAI‐infected wild bird if in addition access of poultry to any outdoor area were prevented Consider the scenario described in Q22 and take the median number of poultry holdings you estimated as a starting point for this question. If access by poultry (including waterfowl) to the water bodies AND access of poultry to any outdoor area were prevented in these poultry holdings, what would be the number of such poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 7.21 29.38 110.54 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb3 inf) Probability for a holding to get the infection given the presence of 100 HPAI‐infected wild bird if in addition routine (daily average practiced) biosecurity measures were applied (disinfection of boots, changing clothes, washing hands) Consider the scenario described in Q23 and take the median number of poultry holdings you estimated as a starting point for this question. If access by poultry (including waterfowl) to the water bodies AND access of poultry to any outdoor area were prevented AND routine (daily average practiced, e.g. on a layer/fattening holding) biosecurity measures were applied (e.g. disinfection of boots, changing clothes, washing hands, standard filtering provisions) in these poultry holdings, what would be the number of such poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 2.39 7.75 28.21 5,000 Formal EKE
Prob(PHb4 inf) Probability for a holding to get the infection given the presence of 100 HPAI‐infected wild bird if in addition high biosecurity measures were applied (as practised in nucleus or breeding herds) (rigorous implementation of showering in, complete exclusion of wild birds to feed, bedding and animal by‐products, separation of houses) Consider the scenario described in Q23 and take the median number of poultry holdings you estimated as a starting point for this question. If access by poultry (including waterfowl) to the water bodies AND access of poultry to any outdoor area were prevented AND high biosecurity measures were applied (as practised in nucleus or breeding holding) (e.g. rigorous implementation of showering in; complete exclusion of wild birds to feed, bedding and animal by‐products; separation of houses) in these poultry holdings, what would be the number of such poultry holdings that will get infected in one day 2.3.4.4 0 0.0026 0.6694 6.6169 5,000 Formal EKE
ProbInf_NWB|contact Probability that a susceptible non‐water bird becomes infected given a contact with excretions containing infectious virus in a forage area Think of a standard population of 10,000 non‐water birds (see definition above). Indicate the number of these birds that might become infected, provided they get in contact with excretions containing infectious virus in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000). Think of the various groups of birds separately (i.e. raptors, songbirds, waders, gulls–storks–cranes) and then sum them up 2.3.4.4 0 0.0001 0.000325 0.00065 0.0125 Semi‐formal EKE
ProbInf_WB|contact Probability that a susceptible water bird becomes infected given a contact with excretions containing infectious virus in a forage area Think of a population of 10,000 water birds. Indicate the number of these birds that might become infected, provided they get in contact with excretions containing infectious virus in a foraging area (see definition above) in a standard day (number out of 10,000) 2.3.4.4 0.000025 0.00055 0.002125 0.004 0.025 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedNWB Duration in days of the shedding period in non‐water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected non‐water bird will shed the infectious virus 2.3.4.4 0 2.7 5 7.6 14 Semi‐formal EKE
ShedWB Duration in days of the shedding period in water birds Total number of days a HPAI‐infected water bird will shed infectious virus 2.3.4.4 0 3 5 7 14 Semi‐formal EKE
WBin Number of water birds landing into a holding Estimate the average number, over 2016–2017 fall–winter migratory season (5 months duration), of water birds (migratory and/or residential) that will land on any holding surface of a worst‐case poultry holding 2.3.4.4 0.1 5.5 50 300 1,000 Formal EKE