Table 3.
Presumptive ESBL‐producersb | Presumptive AmpC‐producersc | ESBL + AmpC phenotype | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | %Occ | %Prev | n | %Occ | %Prev | n | %Occ | %Prev | |
Fattening pigs (Ns = 6,167; N = 2,441)d | 1,869 | 76.6 | 31.9 | 569 | 23.3 | 9.7 | 87 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
Calves (Ns = 2,343; N = 895)e | 830 | 92.7 | 36.8 | 108 | 12.1 | 4.8 | 46 | 5.1 | 2.0 |
Meat from pigs (Ns = 5,350; N = 319)f | 252 | 78.9 | 7.0 | 79 | 24.8 | 2.3 | 14 | 4.4 | 0.4 |
Meat from bovines (Ns = 5,329; N = 209)g | 159 | 76.1 | 5.0 | 57 | 27.3 | 1.8 | 9 | 4.3 | 0.3 |
Ns: number of animal/meat samples; N: number of the isolates tested; n: number of the isolates resistant; %Occ: percentage of resistant isolates; %Prev: percentage of samples harbouring a presumptive ESBL‐/AmpC‐producing E. coli.
Italy submitted only genotype results.
Isolates exhibiting an ESBL‐ and/or ESBL/AmpC‐phenotype.
Isolates exhibiting an AmpC‐ and/or ESBL/AmpC‐phenotype.
27 MSs included.
9 MSs included.
22 MSs included.
23 MSs included.