Table 5.
Sources of uncertainties | Directiona |
---|---|
Consumption data: different methodologies/representativeness/underreporting/misreporting/no portion size standard | +/– |
Use of data from food consumption survey of a few days to estimate long‐term (chronic) exposure for high percentiles (95th percentile) | + |
Correspondence of reported use levels and analytical data to the food items in the EFSA Comprehensive Food Consumption Database: uncertainties to which types of food the levels refer to | +/– |
Uncertainty in possible national differences in use levels of food categories | +/– |
Food categories selected for the exposure assessment: exclusion of food categories due to missing FoodEx linkage (n = 9/67 food categories) | – |
Food categories selected for the exposure assessment: inclusion of food categories without considering the restriction/exception (n = 2/67 food categories) | + |
The 3 food categories which were taken into account in the refined exposure assessment scenarios out of all authorised food categories (n = 67), corresponded to only 0.5 and 17% of the amount (g of foods by body weight) of food consumption documented in the EFSA Consumption Database | – |
Food categories included in the exposure assessment: data not available for certain food categories which were excluded from the exposure estimates (only 3 food categories with available data) | – |
Regulatory maximum level exposure assessment scenario:
|
+ – – |
Refined exposure assessment scenarios:
|
+/– – – |
+, uncertainty with potential to cause over‐estimation of exposure; –, uncertainty with potential to cause underestimation of exposure.