Feed commodity | Median dietary burden | Maximum dietary burden | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Input value (mg/kg) | Comment | Input value (mg/kg) | Comment | |
Scenario EU1: considering all authorised GAPs | ||||
Citrus fruits, dried pulp | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Apple, wet pomace | 1.1 | STMR × PF (1.5) | 1.1 | STMR × PF (1.5) |
Potato, culls | 2.7 | STMR | 4.6 | HR |
Potato, process waste | 53 | STMR × 20a | 53 | STMR × 20a |
Potato, dried pulp | 101 | STMR × 38a | 101 | STMR × 38a |
Brewer's grain, dried | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat, distiller's grain (dry) | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat gluten, meal | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat, milled by‐products | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Small grain cereals, grain | 0.01* | STMR | 0.01* | STMR |
Small grain cereals, straw | 0.01* | STMR | 0.01* | HR |
Scenario EU2: excluding GAPs on apples/pears and considering fall‐back GAPs on potatoes (and oranges/grapefruits) | ||||
Grapefruits, dried pulp | 6.3 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 6.3 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Oranges, dried pulp | 6.3 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 6.3 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Lemons, dried pulp | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Lime, dried pulp | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Mandarin, dried pulp | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) | 8.8 | STMR × PF (4.2) |
Potato, culls | 0.01* | STMR | 0.01* | HR |
Potato, process waste | 0.01* | STMRc | 0.01* | HRc |
Potato, dried pulp | 0.01* | STMRc | 0.01* | HRc |
Brewer's grain, dried | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat, distiller's grain (dry) | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat gluten, meal | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Wheat, milled by‐products | 0.01* | STMRb | 0.01* | STMRb |
Small grain cereals, grain | 0.01* | STMR | 0.01* | STMR |
Small grain cereals, straw | 0.01* | STMR | 0.01* | HR |
GAP: good agricultural practice; STMR: supervised trials median residue; HR: highest residue; PF: processing factor.
* Indicates that the input value is proposed at the limit of quantification.
In scenario EU1 (with critical GAP: ware potatoes), in the absence of processing factors supported by data, default processing factors of 20 (process waste of potatoes) and 38 (potatoes, dried pulp) were, respectively, included in the calculation to consider the potential concentration of residues in these commodities.
For processed commodities of cereals (brewer's and distiller's grain, gluten and milled by‐products), no default processing factor was applied because imazalil is applied as a seed treatment and residues are expected to be below the LOQ. Concentration of residues in these commodities is therefore not expected.
In scenario EU2 (with fall‐back GAP: seed potatoes), default processing factors were not applied to processed commodities of potatoes (process waste and dried pulp) because imazalil is applied as a seed treatment and residues are expected to be below the LOQ. Concentration of residues in these commodities is therefore not expected.