Crop	Region/indoora	Residue levels observed in the supervised residue trials relevant to the supported GAPs (mg/kg)	Recommendations/comments (OECD calculations)	MRL proposals (mg/kg)	HRMo (mg/kg)b	STMRMo (mg/kg)c	CFd
Citrus fruits	EU (drenching: 50 g a.i./hL; WHP: 0 day)	Mo [whole fruit] – Oranges: 0.57; 0.59; 0.6; 0.66; 0.66; 0.84; 1.36; 1.4; 2.06; 2.09; 2.2; 2.2; 2.46; 2.58; 2.59; 2.81; 2.89; 3.12; 4.95 Mo [whole fruit] – Mandarins: 0.49; 0.6; 1.3; 1.51; 1.6; 1.8; 1.8; 2.19; 2.26; 2.4; 2.66; 2.72; 3.34; 4.84 RA [whole fruit] – Oranges: ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; 2.09; ‐; ‐; 2.46; 2.58;‐; 2.81; ‐; ‐; ‐ RA [whole fruit] – Mandarins: ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; 2.27; ‐; 2.68; 2.75; 3.36; ‐	Combined data set on oranges and mandarins, compliant with GAP (EFSA, 2010; Netherlands, 2015; Spain, 2016). Residue levels of R014821 may slightly increase with the waiting period. Rber = 5.25 Rmax = 4.46 MRLOECD: not relevante	6 (tentative)f	4.95	2.09	1
		Mo [Pulp] – Oranges: 5 × < 0.01; 0.02; 0.03; 0.04; 0.09; 0.12; 0.21; 0.69 Mo [Pulp] – Mandarins: 0.02; 0.02; 0.05; 0.08; 0.12; 0.18; 0.43; 0.48	Residue levels directly measured in pulp and coming from the same set of residue trials as above were reported for a refined risk assessment	–	0.69	0.05	1g
Oranges Grapefruits (fall‐back option)	EU (waxing: 300 g a.i./hl Volume of 1 L/ton fruits equivalent to 3 g a.i./ton; WHP: 0 day)	Mo [whole fruit] – Oranges: 0.43; 0.47; 1.1; 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 1.7; 2.1 Mo [whole fruit] – Mandarins: 1.2; 1.5; 1.6; 1.7; 2.1; 2.3 RA : ‐	Combined data set on oranges and mandarins, compliant with GAP (Spain, 2016). Rber = 3.60 Rmax = 2.89 MRLOECD: not relevante	4 (tentative)f	2.3	1.5	1g
		Mo [Pulp] – Oranges: 4 × < 0.01 Mo [Pulp] – Mandarins: < 0.01; 0.02	Residue levels directly measured in pulp and coming from the same set of residue trials as above were reported for a refined risk assessment	–	0.02	0.01	1g
Apples Pears	EU (drenching: 25–30 g a.i./hL; WHP: 0 day)	Mo Apples: 0.3; 0.39; 0.42; 0.55; 0.57; 0.59; 0.63; 0.65; 0.76; 0.84; 0.89; 0.9; 1; 1.33 Mo Pears: 0.34; 0.35; 0.38; 0.45; 0.50; 0.57; 0.66; 0.7; 0.82; 1.02; 1.15; 1.23; 1.24; 1.45; 2.0; 2.1; 2.28; 3.5 RA Apples: ‐ RA Pears: ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; 0.82; 1.02; 1.15; 1.23; 1.24; 1.45; ‐; 2.1; 2.28; ‐	Combined data set on apples and pears, compliant with GAP (Belgium, 1996; Netherlands, 2016, Spain, 2016). Rber = 2.42 Rmax = 2.47 MRLOECD: not relevante	4	3.50	0.73	1
	EU (drenching: 38 g a.i./hL; WHP: 60 days)	Mo Apples: 0.4; 0.53; 0.66; 0.75; 1.55; 1.71; 1.81; 2.11; 2.38; 2.77 Mo Pears: 1.2; 1.4 RA Apples: ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; 1.69; ‐; 1.95; 2.19; ‐; 2.82 RA Pears: ‐; ‐	Combined data set on apples and pears, compliant with GAP (Netherlands, 2015; Spain, 2016). Rber = 3.57 Rmax = 4.07 MRLOECD: not relevante	4	2.77	1.48	1
	EU (smoke can: 6 g a.i./tonnes; WHP: 30 days)	Mo Apples: 0.36, 0.38 Mo Pears: 0.74, 0.79 RA: ‐	Combined data set on apples and pears, compliant with GAP (Spain, 2016). Rber = 1.56 Rmax = 1.75 MRLOECD: not relevante	2 (tentative)h	0.79	0.56	1g
Bananas	EU (post‐harvest dipping)	Mo [whole fruit]: 2.12; 2.61; 2.71; 2.8 RA [whole fruit]: 2.76; 2.64; 2.76; 2.83	Trials compliant with GAP (Greece, 2016). No data available on pulp at the relevant PHI (35 days). Rber = 5.56 Rmax = 4.12 MRLOECD: not relevante	5 (tentative)h	2.80	2.66	1
Potatoes	EU (ware potatoes, post‐harvest spraying)	Mo: 0.46; 0.88; 1.51; 1.83; 2.65; 3.4i; 4.1i; 4.5i; 4.6i RA: ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; ‐; 3.4i; 4.1i; 4.5i; 4.6i	Trials compliant with GAP (Netherlands, 2015). Rber = 8.6 Rmax = 7.43 MRLOECD: not relevante	9 (tentative)i	4.60	2.65	1
	NEU (seed potatoes, post‐harvest spraying)	Mo: 10 × < 0.01 RA: ‐	Trials compliant with GAP (France, 2016). Metabolite R014821 not expected to occur after seed treatment	0.01*	0.01	0.01	1j
	SEU (seed potatoes, post‐harvest spraying)	Mo: 10 × < 0.01 RA: ‐	Trials compliant with GAP (France, 2016). Metabolite R014821 not expected to occur after seed treatment	0.01*	0.01	0.01	1j
Tomatoes	EU	Mo: 0.03; 0.03; 0.08; 0.08; 0.09; 0.16; 0.15; 0.14 RA: ‐	Trials on tomatoes compliant with GAP. Metabolite R014821 not expected to occur (EFSA, 2010). MRLOECD = 0.3	0.3	0.16	0.09	1j
Sweet peppers/bell peppers	EU	–	No data available	–	–	–	–
Cucumbers Gherkins Courgettes	EU	Mo: 0.02; 0.05; 0.01; 0.02 RA: 0.02; 0.05; 0.01; 0.02	Trials performed on cucumbers. Two first trials compliant with GAP. Two additional trials performed with 3 applications instead of 4 (Netherlands, 2016). MRLOECD = 0.09	0.1 (tentative)h	0.05	0.02	1
Melons	EU (post‐harvest drenching	Mo: 0.47; 0.47; 0.47 RA: ‐	Trials performed with drench application (25% deviation on the application rate) (Belgium, 1996)	–	–	–	–
Barley grains Oats grains Rye grains Wheat grains	NEU	Mo: 4 × < 0.05; 4 × < 0.01 RA: ‐	Trials performed on barley and compliant with GAP (Belgium, 1996; EFSA, 2010). Based on NEU and SEU trials, an MRL of 0.01* mg/kg can be proposed. Metabolite R014821 not expected to occur (EFSA, 2010)	0.01*	0.01	0.01	1j
	SEU	Mo: 4 × < 0.01 RA: ‐
Barley straw Oat straw Rye straw Wheat straw	NEU	Mo: 4 × < 0.01 RA: ‐	Trials on barley compliant with GAP (EFSA, 2010). Based on NEU and SEU trials, an MRL of 0.01* mg/kg can be proposed. Metabolite R014821 not expected to occur (EFSA, 2010)	0.01*	0.01	0.01	1j
	SEU	Mo: 4 × < 0.01 RA: ‐

GAP: Good Agricultural Practice; OECD: Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development; MRL: maximum residue level; WHP: withholding period; PHI: preharvest interval; Mo: monitoring; RA: risk assessment.

* Indicates that the MRL is proposed at the limit of quantification.

^aNEU: Outdoor trials conducted in northern Europe, SEU: Outdoor trials conducted in southern Europe, Indoor: indoor EU trials or Country code: if non‐EU trials.

^bHighest residue according to the residue definition for monitoring.

^cSupervised trials median residue according to the residue definition for monitoring.

^dConversion factor for risk assessment; median of the individual conversion factors at the supported PHI for each residues trial (if trials analysing for both residue definition are available).

^eMRL_OECD calculator is not relevant for data obtained by post‐harvest treatment as it may artificially overestimate the MRL calculation derived from homogeneous data set.

^fMRL is tentative because the storage stability of the metabolite R014821 is not covered in commodities with high acid content.

^gIn the absence of trials analysing for metabolite R014821, a CF of 1 is assumed based on the results observed on the other fruit commodities following post‐harvest treatment (with short WHP).

^hMRL is tentative because additional residue data trials are still required.

ⁱHighest residue levels were observed after a DAT longer than 0 day in samples that were washed before analysis; therefore the whole results are deemed questionable and are used on a tentative basis to derive MRL and risk assessment values.

^jAlthough data for metabolite R014821 are not available (or limited), a conversion factor (CF) of 1 can be considered as the metabolite R014821 is not expected to occur for this GAP.