Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;15(3):e04664. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4664

Table 2.

Table summarising the areas of assessment for the QPS approach and for each EFSA food and feed safety risk assessment area when microorganisms are considered

QPS assessment remit Feed area assessment remita Food Ingredients area assessment remitb Pesticides area assessment remitc Nutrition area assessment remitd
1. Identity: taxonomy identification parameters

Verification of species and strain

Certificate of deposit in a culture collection

Verification of species and strain

Certificate of deposit in a culture collection

Verification of species and strain

Certificate of deposit in a culture collection

Verification of species and strain

Certificate of deposit in a culture collection

(for Health Claims and Novel Foods (NF))

2.1. Body of Knowledge: history of safe use in the food and feed chain

Other authorisations and uses

Description of the genetic modifications

Confirm genetic stability

Other authorisations of the same strain lineage

Description of the genetic modifications

Confirm genetic stability

Proposed uses

Historical background

Organisms genetically modified should comply to the GMO Regulation

Confirm genetic stability

History of safe use

(for NF)

2.2 Body of Knowledge: general ecology/distribution in ecosystems

Origin to be declared

Production of antimicrobial compounds

Production of antimicrobial compounds

Origin (geographical and place in the ecosystem) and natural occurrence (if possible at strain level)

Ability to colonise available niches

Production of antimicrobial compounds

Out of the scope of the specific Regulation
3.1. Safety concerns: virulence/pathogenicity/toxigenicity for humans

Pathogenicity potential and virulence factors

Production of toxins and toxic secondary metabolites

Pathogenicity potential and virulence factors

Production of toxins and toxic secondary metabolites

Pathogenicity potential and virulence factors

Possible toxicity of secondary metabolites

Pathogenicity potential and virulence factors

(for NF)

3.2. Safety concerns: virulence/pathogenicity/toxigenicity for animals (domestic and wild)

Pathogenicity potential and virulence factors

Production of toxins and toxic secondary metabolites

Out of the scope of the specific Regulation Adverse effects of organism or metabolites on non‐target animals (in the environment) Out of the scope of the specific Regulation
3.3. Safety concerns: virulence/pathogenicity for plants Out of the scope of the specific Regulation Out of the scope of the specific Regulation Adverse effects of organism or metabolites on non‐target vascular plants and algae (in the environment) Out of the scope of the specific Regulation
3.4. Safety concerns: antimicrobial resistance Verification of the absence of antimicrobial resistance associated with acquired genes Verification the of absence of antimicrobial resistance associated with acquired genes Verification of the absence of antimicrobial resistance and of possible transfer of genes coding for resistance

Verification of the absence of antimicrobial resistance associated with acquired genes

(for NF)

3.5. Safety concerns: environmental safety

Genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs): deliberate release

GMMs: the absence of viable cells

GMMs: the absence of recombinant DNA

Effect on water and soil

Not direct applicable within Food Enzymes legislation: Microorganisms used for production purposes, including GMMs: the absence of viable cells

GMMs: the absence of recombinant DNA

Risk for non‐target organisms (which are not vertebrate animals or plants), arising from exposure to the microorganism and its secondary metabolites remaining in or on plants or plant products, in soil water and air Out of the scope of the specific Regulation
4.1. End use: intended exposure to viable cells of animals and consumers

Tolerance studies in target animals

Toxicological studies in vitro and in laboratory animals

Not direct applicable within Food Enzymes legislation: Microorganisms used for production purposes, including GMMs: the absence of viable cells

GMMs: the absence of recombinant DNA

End use is intended exposure of a target organism, i.e. organisms that are: 1) pathogenic to or damage/consume plants or plant commodities; or 2) unwanted plants (weeds). Efficacy investigations are required for these purposes

Intended exposure of viable cells to consumers

(for NF)

4.2. End use: enzymes/metabolites producer: no or limited exposure to viable cells

Microorganisms used for production purposes, including GMMs: absence of viable cells

GMMs: absence of recombinant DNA

Tolerance studies in target animals

Toxicological studies in vitro and in laboratory animals

Microorganisms used for production purposes, including GMMs: absence of viable cells

GMMs: absence of recombinant DNA

When there are no viable cells in a plant protection product then it is regulated as a chemical (not a microorganism) even if it was produced by microbial fermentation

(for NF)

GMM: genetically modified microorganisms; NF: novel food.

a

Based on the specific Feed Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and Regulation (EC) No 429/2008.

b

Based on the specific FIP/GMMs Regulation: absence of recombinant DNA (under Reg. 1829/2003).

c

Based on the specific Pesticides Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC.

d

Based on the specific Health Claims Regulation (EU) No 1924/2006 and Novel foods Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.