Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e04718. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4718

Table 49.

Adverse effects of broiler chickens exposed to DON in feed

Animals (age) n Concentration (mg/kg feed) Toxin source Exposure time Effects LOAEL (mg/kg feed) NOAEL (mg/kg feed) Reference
Studies reported in EFSA (2004)
Ross (day 1) 45 1.8–5.4 Contaminated maize 37 days Increased heart weight n.a. 3.6 Leitgeb et al. (1999)
Broiler chicks (day 1) 36 16 Contaminated wheat 21 days No effect on feed intake, body weight gain or other parameters measured n.a. 16 Harvey et al. (1997)
White Leghorn (day 1) 100 0, 18 Contaminated wheat 12 weeks Reduced body weight after 4 and 8 weeks, but not 12 weeks, increased relative gizzard weight, decreased haemoglobin at 4 weeks, but not after 8 and 12 weeks 18 n.a. Kubena and Harvey (1988)
White Plymouth Rock x White Cornish (day 1) 240 0.1–3.4 Contaminated oats 35 days No effect on feed intake, body weight gain or meat quality n.a. 3.4 Bergsjö and Kaldhusdal (1994)
Hubbard x Hubbard (day 1) 0, 16 0, 16 Contaminated wheat 3 weeks Reduced body weight gain, increased feed:body weight gain ratio, relative gizzard weight and relative bursa weight 16 n.a. Kubena et al. (1989)
Hubbard xHubbard)(day 1) 60 0, 16ad libitum Contaminated wheat 3 weeks Reduced body weight gain, increased feed:body weight gain ratio, increased relative gizzard weight, increased red blood cell count and serum phosphorus, decreased mean corpuscular haemoglobin and glucose 16 n.a. Kubena et al. (1988)
White Leghorn(day 1) 51 0, 9, 18 Contaminated wheat 35 days Reduced liver weight, increased gizzard weight, temporary decreased plasma triglycerides, glucose, increased creatinine, increased plasma haemoglobin and temporary red blood cells 9 n.a. Kubena et al. (1985)
White Leghorn(day 1 to egg production) 30 0, 18ad libitum Contaminated wheat 48 weeks Small significant increase in shell weight, shell thickness, decrease in serum uric acid, glucose, triglycerides and cholesterol and increase in serum γ‐glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase 18 n.a. Kubena et al. (1987a)
White Leghorn(day 7) 50 0–0.7 Contaminated wheat 14 days No significant effect on feed intake, body weight gain or other parameters measured (control feed composition differed from the contaminated diet) n.a. 0.7 Hamilton et al. (1985)
White Leghorn(day 7) 50 3.1–4.1 Contaminated wheat 28 days Increased feed intake, body weight gain and feed:gain ratio or no apparent lesions in oral activity or other parameters measured (control feed composition different from the contaminated diet) n.a. 4.1
White Leghorn(day 1) 60, 0, 18 Contaminated wheat 18 and 9 weeks Reduced immune response to vaccine reduced mitogen‐induced lymphoblastogenesis 18 n.a. Harvey et al. (1991)
Hubbard × Hubbard and white Leghorn(day 1) 10 0, 50 Pure toxin 9 weeks Reduced response to mitogens in female broiler chickens, no effect in male broiler chickens or in leghorn chickens of either gender 50 n.a.
White mountain × Hubbard(6 days) 24 0–210 Contaminated maize 5 days Increased feed conversion, reversible concentration‐dependent increase in oral and gizzard epithelial lesions 49.4 n.a. Moran et al. (1982),
Reduced feed intake n.a. 116.1
Shaver (day 1) 18 × 2 < 0.2–1.87 Contaminated wheat 28 days No effect on feed intake, body weight gain, liver or kidney n.a. 1.89 Hulan and Proudfoot (1982)
Hubbard × Hubbard (day 1) 60 0, 16 Contaminated wheat 3 weeks Reduced body weight, increased feed efficiency, increased relative gizzard weight, anaemia, decreased lactate dehydrogenase and serum triglycerides 16 n.a. Huff et al. (1986)
White Leghorn × Single Comb (26 weeks) 10 0, 83 Contaminated wheat 27 days Small erosions in the gizzard, no other pathological changes 83 n.a. Lun et al. (1986)
Different types 3 0–0.70 Contaminated wheat 86 or 135 days Increased liver triglycerides and total liver lipid at 0.35 mg/kg, not at 0.70 mg/kg n.a. Farnworth et al. (1983)
Studies identified after EFSA (2004)
Lohmann (1 day) 64 0, 3.5, 7, 10.5, 14 Contaminated wheat 3–5 weeks Decreased spleen weight, reduced body weight gain, decreased Newcastle Disease Virus vaccine response 10.5 7 Dänicke et al. (2003)
Ross (1 day) 95 0, 10 Toxin added to feed 6 weeks No effects on feed intake or body weight gain or other zootechnical parameters, alteration of intestinal morphology 10 n.a. Awad et al. (2004, 2006)
Ross (1 day) 8 0, 10 Toxin added to feed 5 weeks Reduced feed intake, reduced body weight gain during the first 2 weeks, reduced total lymphocyte count, decreased Infectious Bronchitis Virus vaccine response 10 n.a. Ghareeb et al. (2012, 2014)
Ross (1 day) 15 0.9, 5 Contaminated wheat 7 weeks Reduced feed intake, reduced body weight, body weight gain during the first 2 weeks but not later, relative weight of organs not altered, in the jejunum the villi were shorter but the villi width not modified n.a. 5 Awad et al. (2011)
Ross (7 day) 25 0.3, 1.7, 12 Contaminated culture medium added to feed 5 weeks Reduced feed intake, reduced of body weight gain and alteration of intestinal morphology during the first 3 weeks, no zootechnical effects at the end of the experiment 12 n.a. Yunus et al. (2012a,2012b)
Ross (3 weeks) 8 2.4, 7.5 Toxin added to feed 3 weeks No effects on feed intake or body weight gain or other zootechnical parameters at the end of the experiment n.a. 7.5 Osselaere et al. (2012, 2013a)
Ross (1 day) 56 0.2–4.6 Contaminated culture medium added to feed 2 weeks No effects on feed conversion ratio and body weight gain n.a. 4.6 Antonissen et al. (2015)

n: number of animals per group; n.a.: not applicable because not identified by the authors of the study or by the CONTAM Panel.

The first part of the table (until the reference of Farnworth et al. 1983) has been modified from EFSA (2004). Note that the units are expressed as mg/kg feed.