Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;15(9):e04718. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4718

Table G.12.

Summary of concentration–response analysis of vomiting in pigs exposed to DON as reported by Williams et al. (1988)

Models Number of parameters Minus Log‐likelihood p‐value AIC BMC10 BMCL10 Comment
(mg/kg feed)
Full model 12 18.93 na 61.86 na na
Null (reduced) model 1 32.75 0. 004 67.50 na na
Probit 2 22.84 0.65 49.68 4.64 3.31 Not selected
Logistic 2 23.14 0.59 50.28 4.89 3.53 Not selected
LogProbit 2 22.18 0.77 48.35 3.93 2.07 Selected
LogLogistic 2 22.30 0.75 48.60 3.93 1.95 Selected
Multistage 2 22.26 0.76 48.52 4.28 1.86 Selected
Multistage Cancer 1 22.29 0.82 46.59 3.97 1.84 AIC minimum
Quantal‐Linear 1 23.64 0.58 49.28 2.05 1.33 Not selected
Weibull 2 22.84 0.65 49.68 4.46 3.31 Not selected
Gamma No fit

DON: deoxynivalenol.

The models selected to identify the lowest BMCL10 following EFSA guidance (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017) are identified in the column ‘Comments’ and include the model with the lowest AIC.

BMC10: benchmark concentration response of 10%; BMCL10: 95% lower/upper confidence limit for the benchmark concentration response (BMR) of 10%; na: not available, including cases where the BMC/Ls were not calculated, the fit was incomplete, or serious or conflicting comments were noted (e.g. parameters reaching boundary).